Battuta Vs Hammurabi

856 Words2 Pages

The king’s wanted to put the peasants in work to provide not only the king, but the peasants themselves security and benefits. Ibn Battuta and King Hammurabi of Babylon ‘s sources prove that the king’s wanted to work the peasants to provide benefits for them. Ibn Battuta was a muslim berber that left Tangier, Morocco to make the pilgrimage to Mecca, dating back to 1354 A.D. King Hammurabi of Babylon established laws for the peasants to follow, which dates back to 1800 B.C. In the city of Delhi, security and benefits are provided to the peasants of the city including Ibn Battuta, and incoming traveler. When Ibn first started his journey he approached the Banj Ab river which was one of the greatest rivers in the world, he was stopped by the …show more content…

He greets him with gifts and sits down. He notices the troops and commanders sitting with him, then tells of how they become the troops and archers. If one wanted to be a archer, a bow was given and pay was based off: how stiff one is when the bow is drawn, how easily one can draw the bow, and where one hits on the target. If one is stiff and can draw and hit the target accurately, one will be payed a very good amount. It is the same process for anyone who is wanting to be a trooper except it is a different challenge. If one wanted to be a trooper, one would get on a horse and would be given a lance and a target, which would be set up. Whoever could hit the target with a lance would become a trooper and the pay would be determined on where one hit the target. If one wanted to be a mounted archer, one would be put on a horse with a bow and an arrow and the target would be a ball. One would ride the horse and whomever could hit the ball would become a mounted archer. The pay applies to the rest of the jobs depending on where one hits on the target. This was the same with every job. In the city, the occupation that one was best at is where one were

Open Document