Battle Of Britain Case Study

517 Words2 Pages

Tony Gened 120 Dr. Kreitlow Shorting writing # 3 2. What were the advantages of Britain over Germany in the Battle of Britain? The British were better equipped to fight in the Battle of Britain than were the Germans. The RAF and the people of London were helpful because the Germans mistook them intelligence, strategy, and targets. The British people had five advantages, including the control of active radar, the enormous ammunition of the Spitfires and Hurricanes, the English fighter pilots' abilities, confusion caused the enemy, and the English people's inspiring unity in the flight. 3. What were the specific grievances that Japan had against the U.S. leading up to Pearl Harbor? The Japanese had offensives from the USA because the US government had argued Japanese confidence by 1931. The USA had heavy drained the sources of the Pacific region. The USA had carrier-based planes to …show more content…

The first part is the phony war. After the third of September, they sent available training combat troops to France. They wanted to start the Middle East war. They asked the troops of Australia and New Zealand to join the war in Egypt because the German troops were weak defense. Also, Nazi forces were in Poland. French Government wanted to enter the war for Soviet Union against. There were serious actions on the sea, such as new naval was accomplishment in WWI with German submarine and British economy. The second part is Vichy. Mers-el-Kebir was at the outset of anti-British emotion push in Vichy, and the Petain Government was located in there. That's the elementary of the Third Republican in an alliance power of hopefulness of French ships. They had Pirre Laval smart leadership that was the disappearance of the old parliament of France vote in the Republic beyond the reality and pertained all force in Marshal Petain. Laval had been the most robust man in Vichy. He trusted the full alliance of German to go against the

Open Document