Banham Ornament And Crime Analysis

399 Words1 Page

Now relating this building to the essay presented in Ideas in Architecture book, Reyner Banham presents his knowledge on Modernism and ornamentation. Banham destined ornament to be a crime as he referred to it as “Ornament Equals Crime”. On the other hand, according to Loos, the use of ornament in modern architecture is considered to be dishonest and immoral. Moreover, Banham highlights the value of Loos’s text where he demonstrated the echoing impact that Loos’s work had on art and architecture of the 20th Century. On the contrary, he disparaged that Loos’s text was not a rational argument, where he states, “did Adolf Loos, then, beat ornament single-handed?”. Responding to the ideas presented in the reading. Loos’s famous essay, ‘Ornament and Crime’, determinedly …show more content…

Al Bahar towers presents an argument that contradicts this statement by being an example of how modern architecture can employ ornamentation but still maintain the “modern architecture” identity. the smart use of ornamentation as exemplified in the building is what identifies it as being contemporary. The use of ornamentation in this building demonstrates the significance of creating a hybridized building façade that employs ornamentation with modern technology. Banham quotes Loos’s statement that “ .. true greatness of our age, that it can no longer bring forth ornament”. This is when Aedas (the architectural design firm of Al Bahar tower) saw an opportunity to integrate the very latest technological expertise with traditional design. The argument that can be made here is that ornamentation can be bought forward only if the designer had the power of transforming ornamentation from decorative to functional. According to Banham, Loos explained his stance with the help of his buildings where the exteriors were plain while the interior spaces were decorated with natural beauty of the material

Open Document