Authenticity As Authentication Essay

1141 Words3 Pages

Authenticity within the culture of popular music is an issue that has been discussed for many years as it can be a huge selling point, it can cause society to either loathe or love a performing artist on how 'authentic' their persona and music is. Moore (2002) brings forward this idea in the article ‘Authenticity as Authentication’: "...ask what (piece of music, or activity) is being authenticated, in this article I ask who”.
What he means by this is that we do not base our opinions on music being authentic but rather if the person behind it is authentic in the eyes of the public. Society wants to be able to relate to an artist as another ordinary human and because of this, authenticity can be a marketable trait that can be paramount in the success of a performer. This idea is also echoed throughout ‘Living underground is tough’ Solomon (2005) and ‘Reality Goes Pop!’ Holmes (2004). This review will compare and contrast between the articles, analysing the methodology behind each and …show more content…

this concept is also echoed by Fairchild (2007) that we perceive artists as “authentic celebrities” when we can familiarise with them as part of the same social caste. The construction of authenticity within these shows showcases the manufactured ideals that Pop music has been criticised for throughout the years which Rock music uses as a marketable trait that the musicians within the genre are authentic and are real to themselves. Also, Holmes examines the pre-live show stage where cameras pan through the waiting room of contestants displaying them as normal people not yet above the general public. Unlike Solomon; Moore and Holmes do not take any ethnographic form of research into account which in the case of their arguments (that we, the general public are the deciders of authenticity) would be deemed important to form a convincing

Open Document