Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Marriage isn’t an easy milestone; potential soul mates are universally everywhere. Subsequently why are there several individuals that either don’t take marriage seriously or don’t get married at all? It’s easy to love someone but compatibility, trust, common backgrounds, family input are key and they all play a factor in a successful marriage. Statistics Canada confirms 4 in 10 marriages end in divorce, where on the other hand where arranged marriages are practices they have a higher success rate as the divorce rate is only at an estimate of 4%. Arranged marriages occur by having two individual families looking for a suitor with the same backgrounds and cultural views and having the maybe bride and groom meet up to see if there are any sparks …show more content…
In an arranged marriage it’s tough at the beginning, the couple do not know one another as well as they should but the relationship progresses the bond becomes stronger. There are many positives in an arranged marriage for example the divorce rate is much lower then other marriages. Since this type of marriage is practiced most in eastern side of the country there is a social stigma for divorce and leaving your children and wife, due to this stigma the couple usually just learn to live with or work out. Another positive is the man and the woman come from the same social class, and have similar religious and cultural background, which helps them get along. It is difficult for a couple that have different cultural and religious backgrounds to get along at times due to lack of understanding on both ends.. “Mixed marriages often face additional struggles and challenges in the field of parenting. Raising a child always leads to conflicts if the parents are not on the same page.” When looking for a suitor the elders make sure the suitor is well suited for their child, so they do not struggle in the future and once they have found someone that will be well suited for the marriage they plan a meeting for the bride and groom. If they are interested in one another then they usually ask for meetings to get to know one another and …show more content…
It was believed that arranged marriages would create stronger, happier marriages, which also took form in social, political, alliances. Arranged marriages are still the most successful marriage over love marriage which are now most commonly seen in the western community. Arranged marriages were a norm in the Elizabethan era and were followed out for a long period of time until the 18th century where love marriage was introduced and individuals were able to choose their own partner. Arranged marriages back then were roughly like forced marriage where the bride had practically no say about her future husband. Woman in the Elizabethan era were more obedient to men as they were thought as the lower figure in the relationship. “Western marriage is that the woman had very little, if any, choice in who her husband might be. Elizabethan Women were subservient to men. They were dependent on their male relatives to support them.” Now that love marriage has become the norm in our western society arranged marriages are most seen in the Middle East, Asia and Africa as they are third world countries cultural values, social class, and religion are still prominent and so love marriage is not as socially acceptable in these parts of world. The elders would much rather find someone that is qualified for their kin rather then those who are under qualified. In these countries since culture plays a
Both Stephanie Coontz in “Great expectations” and Archena Bhalla in “My home, my world” address the issue about marriage and arranged marriages. While Stephanie mostly speaks on couples don’t make marriage their top priority and don’t last for a long time. And she gives an example by saying that “People nowadays don’t respect the marriage vowels.” She also believes that in the 18th and 19th centuries, conventional wisdom among middle-class men was the kind of woman you’d want for a wife was incapable of sexual passion which has changed in the 20th century. Also that marriage was viewed in the prospective that work relationship in which passion took second place to practicality and intimacy never was important with male. Bhalla speaks
Marriage, also called matrimony or wedlock, is defined in general as a social, and legal contract between two individuals that unites their lives legally, economically, and emotionally. There are several basic rules for a marriage to succeed, but the way those two persons decided to be bound by marriage defines the validity of those rules. The typical two ways a couple can end up marrying are, direct contact resulting in love, or arranged marriage. Our topic will shed light on the arranged marriage situation then comparing it to love marriage, while also bringing up the case of forced arranged marriage, and discussing its two different types, then presenting the modern arranged marriage and proving its effectiveness.
Throughout history, especially in the fifteenth century, it was extremely rare for a woman to choose her husband. The majority of marriages were planned by the head of the household, which was usually the father of the bride or groom. The purposes of these marriages were to gain power and social standings. This in turn also provided the chance for the heirs of the marriages to have possession of power, territory/land, and a set social standard for the family for all future heirs. This was more of a benefit for the men than the women, for the men could own territories and be the head of the household, women could not. Instead, a woman’s obligation was to fulfill their family’s jurisdiction in their future.
Marriage was something that was to benefit both families in the 1500-1600s. It was considered foolish to marry for love, and with permission from parents boys were allowed to be married at 14 and girls at 12. It was recommended that males didn’t marry before 22 and girls before 18. Single women were thought to be witches.
ases not more important than love. It is clear and evident that marriages in the 18 hundreds was a very important factor in life and even controlled peoples lives to a certain extent, an example of that is how Mrs Bennet goes mad when she hears the words, single man, and well paid. It is also clear that marriages in the 18 hundreds have changed significantly compared to marriages of today. Marriages today are based on love and friendship, not money and personal positions and status. However it is evident that marriages like this were the norm and were happening very frequently.
An arranged marriage is where the parents are obligating the future newly-weds to marry someone whom they have possibly never met before with no say being taken into consideration (Zuffoletti 1). “Marriages would be arranged to bring prestige or wealth to the family. The children of landowners would be expected to marry to increase the size of the acreage” (Alchin 1). Usually another purpose why arranged marriages occurred were due to the fact that ‘parents know best’ and are better equipped at finding a soul mate with the same interests and are more compatible to you (Ros 1). Furthermore, “During the Elizabethan Era there were a plethora of family alliances formed by arranged marriages” (Tiers 1). Reasons of this I am not sure why but that adds up to a reason on why many families had arranged marriages for their child (children).
Both arguments against and for the practice of arranged marriage were compelling. For example, the argument favoring arranged marriages offered insight into a viewpoint not seen or considered very often. A good idea for future research on the practice of arranged marriages would perhaps be the study of what causes arranged marriages to fail as compared to what causes western marriages to fail. This data could then perhaps be used to prevent divorce and improve the quality and survival rate of marriages
Marriage at the time focused on a heterosexual relationship between a man and woman. Kirsti S. Thomas, explains that marriage did not concern the true love element that exists in the typical marriages of today. At the time of Shakespeare, she states that marriage "served to transfer wealth or property and to continue the family line" (2). Marriages were the result of socially and economically oriented environments, similar to the caste system in India. According to a web source specializing in Renaissance weddings, such couplings of ".arranged marriages of the upper class were decided when the bride and groom were young, usually ten to eleven years.
During the Middle Ages and Renaissance period marriage and love were idealized, divine and celebrated. Weddings were large events that included the entire families of both the groom and the bride. Reality was different; women were viewed as being fickle, inferior to men and a possession of men. Women had very little, if any, choice in who they would marry. Marriages were arranged so that both families would benefit in gaining wealth or power. Even though the ruler of England for over 4 decades was female, women were still not respected. Women were kept at home and not allowed to take place in public events. In Shakespeare’s Richard III, male and female relationships are displayed as deeply cynical and are based on lies, lust and political gain.
In the Elizabethian England years, it was considered a foolish act to marry for love; people believed that love might occur in a marriage. When a man wanted to marry, he had to tell his parents since they had wisdom on how to marry. A young man was supposed to let them look out for the one 's best interest, negotiate, and then recommend a marriage
On one hand, in arranged marriages the family of the person chooses the best candidature for marriage because the family wants to create a good couple which will match and the families of men and women are making their choice according to number of benefits it can give. “Many Indians look at marrying a person they don’t know, gives one “a lifetime to learn to love them”, as opposed to the American ideal of learning a person inside and out before entering into marriage. It can be said that an arranged marriage in India is not based on feelings, but rather on commitment” (Debashish, 2013). So this king of building the relations is also taking the feelings into account but the rat...
In the Victorian Era, marriage was viewed as a means to financial success. Marriage was a matter of convenience for money, not for love. The marriage
Arranged marriages have been around for a while and they still are. In some countries arranged marriages are actually tradition but it is wrong to arrange a marriage for necessity instead of love. Did you know that arranged marriages can be annulled? You can legally annul your arranged marriage with a legal court session. With arranged marriages, you hurt your children more than help them. By marrying them at a young age, they don't get much education. Arranged Marriages are cruel because people deserve the choice of who they marry and a chance of love.
If a woman were to go against what her husband said, she would be beaten. Since women were viewed as lesser than men, when a woman became pregnant they wanted a boy over a girl. B. “As marriages were almost completely arranged, many parents would have tried to get their children to marry someone with a high status so the family could have also gotten the share of privileges (Satoshi Ian Noguchi).” Marriage is supposed to be about love and passion for someone.
For years, there has been much debate over the topic of stable marriage. Currently, there is a general debate among some people on whether the stable marriage would come from love or arranged marriage. They believe that relationships have developed over time, and more people believe in love, marriage, nevertheless tradition and religion. Their belief is that people should be able to marry whoever they want, live happily, and carefree no matter the involvement in the relationship between the tradition and the religion.