Army Human Resources Sergeant

635 Words2 Pages

The role of the Army Human Resources (HR) Sergeant is that of a leader in the Profession of Arms (The Profession of Arms 2010, p. 3) and also a subject matter expert on all matters pertaining to human resources support. Undoubtedly the core competencies of HR support including Man the Force, Provide HR Services, Coordinate Personnel Support, and Conduct HR Planning and Operations should be the main areas of expertise for an HR Sergeant (FM 1-0 Human Resources Support 2014, Figure 1-1). However, this essay focuses on the topic of empathy as one of three key psychological resource for moral action, the other two being self-command and moral pride (The Profession of Arms 2010, p. 14). It is straightforward to teach a Soldier technical ability …show more content…

A HR Sergeant may exhibit empathy by listening attentively in an attempt to grasp the perspective of others (Taylor-Clark 2015, Figure 1). To me, it means making an effort to put myself in another person’s shoes to know how they would feel in a circumstance. From the standpoint of an HR Sergeant, empathy is an essential skill because human resources in any industry – not just the Army – is a customer services-oriented field and empathizing with clients is essential to understand how to best serve their needs. Of course, empathy is important to consider when discussing management and team-building, but this essay is a discourse on the service-client relationship. In an organization such as a major private airline, mistreatment of customers, including dragging a paying customer off the plane to empty his paid seat for an employee is a major public relations blunder. Furthermore, when that major airline’s CEO takes three attempts to give an empathetic apology, that just exacerbates the situation (Gourguechon 2017). Similarly, in the public service of the Army, an HR Sergeant must consider empathy with each and every interaction he/she has with clients. Doing so will allow them to “turn moral understanding into professional action” by “placing the capability for ethical action under the control of autonomous professionals” The Profession of Arms 2010, p. 14-15). It is likely that the HR Sergeant will experience problems that involve moral ambiguities for which there are no simple answers; in such circumstances it is crucial for that Army leader to use empathy to find a

Open Document