Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how the elements of tragedy as stated by aristotle of modern relevance
how the elements of tragedy as stated by aristotle of modern relevance
how the elements of tragedy as stated by aristotle of modern relevance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Aristotle was a phenomenal Greek philosopher. His words and thoughts inspired millions, and continue inspiring today. He taught lessons to those who would listen, he preached his scientific findings, but above all, Aristotle enjoyed the theatre. In fact, Aristotle had his own views about different genres. Today we will look at tragedy. In Aristotle’s mind, a tragedy was the process of imitating an action which had serious implications, was complete, and possessed magnitude. He even composed six elements that a tragedy must contain. Aristotle’s six elements of tragedy are a plot, characters, thought, verbal expression, song composition, and visual adornment. Each contributes to an aspect of a tragedy.
Fires in the Mirror, written by Anna Devere Smith, is a contemporary tragedy. We can use Aristotle’s 6 elements to deeper analyze Fires in the Mirror and discover what makes it a tragedy, and why it challenges and differs from other tragedies during the ancient Greek period when Aristotle preached his knowledge.
Aristotle’s first element regards the importance of an interesting plot. A plot is a compiled sequence of events in a play. The sequences must be unified because they will all link to the central action. The central action is the goal which the hero is trying to achieve. In Fires in the Mirror, we don’t see a hero, or a timeline plot. This challenges Aristotle’s idea about plot. Instead, we see interviews that are supposed to make up the “would-be” plot. Although they aren’t a series of events, they are still linked because each interview pertains to the riots and the opinions about racism. All are intertwined and relate to the Crown Heights riots of 1991.
Aristotle’s second element pertains to character...
... middle of paper ...
...l of her make up and put on false mustache. She also needs to dress in a men’s suit. Now we can better visualize George since Anna looks like a man and not like herself. Without these costumes, the audience would be very confused, especially during this modern play in which one person plays the role of twenty-six characters.
Overall, Fires in the Mirror is not a traditional Greek tragedy, but we can still link the details to Aristotle’s elements. We can look back at plot, character, thought, verbal expression, song composition, and visual adornment and compare and contrast how the two different styles relate and differentiate. Needless to say, Anna Devere Smith was not traditional when it came to her writing style. Whether a traditional tragedy, or a modern play demonstrating a tragedy, we can always compare and contrast the elements with those of Aristotle.
Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus can be argued that it is related loosely to Rita Dove's The Darker Face of the Earth. This comparative and contrasting characteristics that can be seen within both plays make the reader/audience more aware of imagery, the major characters, plot, attitudes towards women, and themes that are presented from two very different standpoints. The authors Sophocles and Dove both have a specific goal in mind when writing the two plays. In this paper I will take a closer look of the two, comparing and contrasting the plays with the various elements mentioned previously.
Despite the contrast in the characters of Euripedes' Medea and Aristophanes' Lysistrata, the two playwrights depicted how gender inequality can start a fire. As with Medea and Jason, the battle between the two lead to former's madness, leading to the death of the enemies she considered, and, unfortunately, leading as well to the death of her own children. Medea felt betrayed and left behind by her husband Jason, as well as continuously aggravated by Creon despite the fact that i...
Aristotle thought up a list of compulsory requirements for something to be called ‘tragedy’. He concluded “Tragedy affects through pity and fear the catharsis of such emotions.” meaning that during a tragedy, one should feel the emotions of pity and fear--fear that the circumstances which they are observing could one day affect themselves--but that after the spectacle had ended, one would leave feeling ‘lifted up’, as if they had purged themselves of those emotions. In Aristotle’s ‘Poetics’, he stated:
Aristotle views tragedy as an “imitation of an action that is serious,complete and of a certain
Before we look at the distinctive features of the complex plot, it would perhaps be instructive to examine those features which it shares with the simple plot. The unity of structure recommended by Aristotle includes the tripartite division of the plot into the beginning, the middle and the end, as well as the unities of time and action. He stresses unified action, where all action in the plot carries a definite link to other actions, and subsequent actions are the necessary and probable outcomes of the former.
Aristotle’s Poetics is a written work that generates a loose standard for tragedy and also creates a solid definition to produce a
The classical tragedy genre was first interpreted by Greek philosopher, Aristotle. Besides, the genre has continued to follow its formal structure to emphasize the elements, characteristics, and have a powerful effect of the gods on the audiences. With time changing, so does the classical tragedy to modern tragedy. This has taken the classic tragic hero and developed a modern sense of strength to appeal today’s society. However, this can negatively impact their fortuity and lead to their downfall from hamartia. This had been evident when comparing Katie, from Safe Haven by Nicholas Sparks to Jocasta, from Oedipus Rex by Sophocles. The novel and book’s characters
McManus, Barbara F. "Outline of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy." Outline of Aristotle's Theory of Tragedy. Web. 14 Dec. 2013.
In theater, tragedy is an art that many playwrights try to perfect. What makes a perfect tragedy though? Is it the characters? The plot? Or something other than these two cornerstones of theater? According to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, the perfect tragedy consists of a mix of these elements. In his work, Poetics, Aristotle outlines the fifteen elements that create the perfect tragedy. All fifteen of these elements fall into either two main categories, plot and character, or they stand alone, equally as important as the rest. Sophocles’ play, Oedipus Rex uses all fifteen of these elements to create the perfect tragedy. In Oedipus Rex, Sophocles sets the benchmark for future tragedies through Aristotle’s fifteen points of perfect tragedy.
In Aristotle’s book, Poetics, he defines tragedy as, “an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and possessing magnitude; in embellished language, each kind of which is used separately in the different parts; in the mode of action and not narrated; and effecting through pity and fear” (Aristotle 1149). Tragedy creates a cause and effect chain of actions that clearly gives the audience ideas of possible events. The six parts to Aristotle’s elements of tragedy are: Plot, character, language, thought, spectacle, and melody. According to Aristotle, the most important element is the plot. Aristotle writes in Poetics that, “It is not for the purpose of presenting their characters that the agents engage in action, but rather it is for the sake of their actions that they take on the characters they have” (Aristotle 1150). Plots should have a beginning, middle, and end that have a unity of actions throughout the play making it complete. In addition, the plot should be complex making it an effective tragedy. The second most important element is character. Characters...
In The Nature of Tragedy, Aristotle presents that art is used to as a means to rid one’s feelings. Aristotle’s argument consists of how he defines tragedy as an art which surrounds its central idea around a topic which has great importance as well as is serious. According to Aristotle a tragedy is comprised of six parts that help develop its purpose, which is to simply mimic action. Therefore, Aristotle makes it clear that art, in specific tragedies, serve to imitate a specific individual or object to place that person or scenario into perspective. Tragedy helps the actors and viewers to follow along with an organized plot which to Aristotle is the most important aspect of a tragedy. In a sense Aristotle presents this argument with the intention
In Poetics, Aristotle defines plot as “the arrangement of the incidents” (Aristotle 12). He indicates that there are six elements in every tragic play, which are plot, character, thought, diction, melody and spectacle, among these plot is placed in the foremost positi...
The Nature of Tragedy:In the century after Sophocles, the philosopher Aristotle analyzed tragedy. His definition: Tragedy then, is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of action, not of narrative; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation of these emotions.Aristotle identified six basic elements: (1) plot; (2) character; (3) diction (the choice of style, imagery, etc.); (4) thought (the character's thoughts and the author's meaning); (5) spectacle (all the visual effects; Aristotle considered this to be the least important element); (6) song.According to Aristotle, the central character of a tragedy must not be so virtuous that instead of feeling pity or fear at his or her downfall, we are simply outraged. Also the character cannot be so evil that for the sake of justice we desire his or her misfortune. Instead, best is someone"who is neither outstanding in virtue and righteousness; nor is it through badness or villainy of his own that he falls into misfortune, but rather through some flaw [hamartia]". The character should be famous or prosperous, like Oedipus or Medea. What Aristotle meant by hamartia cannot be established.
In all his plays, Aeschylus tended to depict a solitary hero pitted against cosmic forces that are beyond his control. Further, his plays are characterized by simple but powerful plots and lofty dictions. The root of evil and suffering in Aeschylian play springs out of human arrogance and this is dramatized in the familial space torn apart by patricide and matricide. His plays that have survived are The Suppliants, The Persians, The Seven against Thebes, Prometheus and the crowning Orestia trilogy (Agamemnon, The Libation Bearers and The Eumenides). In contrast, the tragedy of the heroes of Sophocles’ plays typically erupts from the decisions made and actions taken based on imperfect knowledge and conflicting claims. Although the role of the chorus remained important it was not central to Sophoclean scheme of tragic conception. Conversely, the individual characters in Sophocles’ tended to be more complex and, unlike the chorus in Aeschylus’s plays, control the rhythm of the plays. His Oedipus Rex is recognized by many as the finest tragedies ever written. For Aristotle, the play is a quintessential example of tragedy. Antigone dramatizes the conflict between the meaning and the limits of a citizen’s duty to law and authority and Antigone’s undying love for his brother. His
In Poetics, Aristotle described the different elements of varied types of poetry, one being a tragedy. As Aristotle stated, the perfect tragedy must be complex, it must excite pity and fear, the main character must be very well-known and prosperous but yet they still have a flaw, and the change of fortune goes from good to bad. The famous play written by Sophocles, Oedipus Rex, fits Aristotle’s definition of the perfect tragedy. The play excites pity among the audience, it contains a tragic hero with a tragic flaw, and this flaw brings down the tragic hero.