Arguments Against The US Electoral College

400 Words1 Page

The United States of America is a representative republic. In order to sustain a representative republic, it requires an actively engaged and informed participation from its citizens. The U.S Electoral College is a process in which the president of the United States is chosen. The founders escaped a tyrannical government, installing this system to prevent corruption, and more of a federalist system. This system balances the national governments power, and the states’ power. This system varies state by state. Generally speaking, the people who make up the electoral college is made up by people who are elected by each of the state’s legislature. This federalist system proves that voters cannot simply vote for their favorable presidential candidate; they must also vote in their local elections. …show more content…

Some feel that this system is “unfair”, and wish to abolish or reform the Electoral College. Those who view it as such are generally individuals whom care solely about presidential elections, wanting their favorable candidate elected. One of the arguments against the Electoral College is “certain votes don’t count.” And that a few states get more votes than other states. For instance, the Bush vs Gore election. In this election, President Bush won by the electoral college vote, but lost the popular vote by a very small margin. Some states appear to have more power in presidential elections, and this is true, because the states with more legislative representatives get more votes because they have more representatives per population, which is

Open Document