Arguments Against Standardized Testing Research

1031 Words3 Pages

By definition, a test is a given short written or oral examination to determine a person’s proficiency or knowledge in a specific subject, and it seems that recently standardized tests have been lacking in regards to the true definition. Standardized testing is speculated to have its roots in seventh century China, where they would administer a test on Confucian era philosophy and poetry as a selection process for civil service, this form of testing has evolved into the tests we know today as the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and the American College Testing (ACT). Today too many students are depressed and anxious from education related stress, the added mental strain of a mandatory test that sometimes even determines whether or not that student goes to college seems cynical and over the top. Standardized tests should be reformed to judge a students ability to retain knowledge and skills long term and steer educators away from solely teaching students how to pass the test. “In 2002, President George W. Bush signed …show more content…

As students go through school they are taught in the major subjects such as math, literature, science, and test taking. Many teachers make sure their students know how to take a test, which is replacing time that could be spent on acquiring the knowledge necessary to answer the questions on their own. Harris, Smith, and Harris (2012) reinforce this by saying, “So by ignoring attributes that they can't properly assess, standardized tests inadvertently create incentives for students to become superficial thinkers—to seek the quick, easy, and obvious answer” (para. 12). It is quite common that students will use tips and tricks to make the process of test taking easier, which wouldn’t be a problem but, the students are now depriving themselves of truly knowing how they answered

Open Document