More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative impacts of animal testing on animals
Negative impacts of animal testing on animals
Negative impacts of animal testing on animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Negative impacts of animal testing on animals
Animal experimentation is as diminishing as a candle snuffer. An animal’s happiness and freedom are like the flame and the testing is like the snuffer. As soon as they are tested on, the animal’s flame goes out and all rights are taken from them. Animal experimentation should not be allowed or legal in the U.S. because it is unfair to animals. While they acknowledge the advancements brought from animal experimentation, many people criticize and object to the cruel practice. One reason for this is that animals and humans are extremely different species. Critics of animal testing believe that since the results are unreliable, animals should not have to go through the possible pain and torture of testing. Secondly, another reason people protest is because animals are denied their freedom and often suffer serious injury and discomfort when dragged through the process. Many people think they should …show more content…
Animal testing is similar to a school bully. The bully picks on someone smaller and weaker than they are and they cause the victim pain to help their self. Just like how many schools have a zero tolerance bully policy, 52% of people disagree, in any form, to animal experimentation. The poll was conducted towards the specific consideration of chimpanzees and dogs, which happens to be one of America’s favorite household pets. Also, the government protests animal experimentation as well. As a matter of fact, they fabricated regulations to prevent testing in the future. Even some people may still support it in a way, a large portion still believe that testing needs to have limitations. In addition, according to the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetic, methods excluding animal experimentation are inadequate for understanding the brain's function and disorders. The institute also says that when testing, animals should not be killed or tested in ways that affects their
One must remember that scientists who carry out animal testing are human to and most definitely do feel some sense of guilt using these animals for the sole reason to benefit mankind. However, “if there were good alternatives to animals that worked better or as well, for less money and hassle, scientists would use them” (Source D). Many believe that animals testing is wrong, but they must understand that at the current time there is no other option. It is difficult to find a different practice has been so substantial and has improved millions of lives and society as a whole. Animal testing, though the testing on animals may not be the best option, the after effects of testing has been successful over the past decades and will continue on this path as scientists and researchers gain more knowledge. There may be a point in time that society becomes so better off that there would be no more need to test
...Because people see animal testing procedures as unethical and immoral, it’s important for them to consider what their health would be like without the process—potentially afflicted with incurable illnesses. Continuing the animal experimenting process can only prove beneficial in promoting fewer ailments and cures to existing and future diseases.
“According to Humane Society International, animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means.”(Peta). Have you ever wondered if a product you own was safe to use? Did you know that millions of animals are tested on each year for the daily products you use? According to Peta, around 26 million animals are tested each year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and healthcare uses (Peta). Animals are harmed or sometimes even killed in this process. Animals are not the same as humans, therefore; the testing done on Animals is not helping our human society, it’s hurting the animals. There are alternative ways to performing testing rather than testing on animals.
It is estimated that each year, over 100 million animals-including mammals, birds, fish, and amphibians-are killed in U.S. laboratories for various testings, according to PETA.org. Americans should reconsider their usage of animal testing due to the fact that humans have an improper advantage to animals. Organizations such as PETA, do whatever possible to protect the rights animals have. Due to such organizations, there have been more reasons to find ways to no longer find the need to test on animals. Animal testing is unfair to animals due to the subjection of unconsenting pain to when used for medical experimentation.
Animal testing is an immoral, heinous, atrocious act. One should never put an animal before his own life; we are all here on earth due to some strand of evolution or the other, making prejudice and other discriminations (man or not) obsolete and meaningless. Those who would think themselves above another creature are each failures in their own individual way. The rights of animals cannot be questioned, it is an inalienable fact that most do not understand, when given thought that is free of bias and the plague of arrogance, as Arthur Schopenhauer once said: “The assumption that animals are without rights and the illusion that our treatment of them has no moral significance is a positively outrageous example of Western crudity and barbarity. Universal compassion is the only guarantee of morality.” In a society as unquestionably advanced as man, a society in which even the consumption of meat is an indulgence and in no way necessary, the duty of treating all life with anything more than a central nervous system is nothing less than a law.
Animal testing has been a highly debated topic in recent years. There are many people who have finally started to speak their minds and tell how they feel about testing on animals. But just as there are those who oppose animal testing, there are those who fully support it. A majority of people who do not support animal testing provide valid facts and information for why it is not needed. Some of the facts that they provide revolve around the conditions that the animals have to endure in the testing labs. The Animal Welfare Act lays out rules about how animals are allowed to be tortured, beaten, maimed, and all sorts of other things as long as they get pain relief. Those who oppose animal testing also provide facts that show how unreliable the
Animal testing is a controversial topic with two main sides of the argument. The side apposing animal testing states it is unethical and inhumane; that animals have a right to choose where and how they live instead of being subjected to experiments. The view is that all living organism have a right of freedom; it is a right, not a privilege. The side for animal testing thinks that it should continue, without animal testing there would be fewer medical and scientific breakthroughs. This side states that the outcome is worth the investment of testing on animals. The argument surrounding animal testing is older than the United States of America, dating back to the 1650’s when Edmund O’Meara stated that vivisection, the dissection of live animals, is an unnatural act. Although this is one of the first major oppositions to animal testing, animal testing was being practiced for millennia beforehand. There are two sides apposing each other in the argument of animal testing, and the argument is one of the oldest arguments still being debated today.
Animal experimentation is both unnecessarily cruel and inaccurate proving that it is neither beneficial nor ethical to perform. Animals are living creatures just like people and yet are treated as though they are nothing but tools by the self-proclaimed advanced species of the Earth. Alternatives to animal testing have been developed and presented throughout the years but scientists are stubborn and stuck in their ways so they continue to experiment on innocent creatures. Testing on animals is a barbaric practice that should have been abolished long ago yet humans have continued to perform the tests for years.
An English philosopher Jeremy Bentham once stated his question about animals “Can they reason?Can they talk? most importantly, Can they suffer?”(Peter Singer) Are animals born to be experimented ? In fact,95% of animals are not protected by Federal Animal Welfare act[AWA] in experiments(The Hastings Center). Some people think animal testing is unjust because of how they treat animals and use animals. which is just cruel and inhumane. I mean why are scientists using animals when we can use humans for more reliable information? It has been said that alternative testing is now available and the testing can decrease the use of animals. Statistics show the number of animals not counted by APHIS range from 85%-96% of the total of all animals used for testing(National Association for Biomedical Research). Based on this, it shows animals are suffering so we should refrain from relying on them. Therefore, animals testing should not be used for experiments.
Tens of millions of animals are killed or maimed each year through research on the safety and effectiveness of new drugs, chemicals, and consumer products. Even though animals are not humans does not mean they should be used for testing, which is so inhumane. These animals could have a different importance in society than just experimentation. What is done to animals is usually not safe, ending up with the animal injured or even dead. This experimentation however, is becoming less useful because scientists are creating new ways for testing. Animal testing is cruel and inhuman, causing too many animals to be injured or killed when safer alternatives are becoming available.
Animal testing is the use of non-human animals for scientific experimentation. There are estimates that 50 to 100 million vertebrate animals worldwide from zebra fish to on-human primates are used annually. Much larger numbers of invertebrates are used even flies and worms are used has model organisms are very important, experiments on invertebrates are largely unregulated and not included in statistics. Animals are euthanized after being used in a experiment. Some of these animals are purpose-bred and others are caught in the wild or they are supplied by dealers who obtain them from auctions and pounds. The testing on the animals are conducted inside universities, medical schools, pharmaceutical companies, farms, defense establishments and commercial facilities that provide animal-testing services to industry. Some of the tests that researchers do on the animals are biomedical research transplantation, drug testing and toxicology test, cosmetics and other animals are used for directional research, breeding and defense research. Organizations like PETA and BUVA thinks it it not a necessity for this testings. They think is is cruel, poor scientific practice, poorly regulated and that animals used for experimentations have an intrinsic right not be be used for experimentation. Many Americans don’t agree with testing on animals. Testing animals is wrong and they are just poor helpless animals and they die every day. They are testing animals with products such has soap, household cleaners, drugs, cosmetics, pesticides and other chemicals. Drug tests that are done on animals that pass the test end up harming or killing humans. Lists of animals that get tested daily are cats, dogs, monkeys, mice, and rabbits. The researchers test these ...
Around each year 26 million animals in the United States are taken away from their habitat and are used for animal testing. These animals are used for scientific developments and commercial products therefore when being tested on these animals they are harmed. Animal testing is wrong because animals have feelings, emotions, and a life. Animals should have the right to not be taken away from there habitat to be in a cage tested and abused. Since scientists are experimenting why not experiment on some thing other then animals. Human products should be used on humans since it’s for human and not used on innocent animals. This is one of the many reasons of animal extinctions and scientists are encouraging others to try and do there experiment on these poor animals therefore people around the world should stand against it.
At this moment, millions of animals know cold cages in laboratories as home, but why? Some of these animals are subjects for medical research purposes, while others are used out of pure curiosity and to test different products. Majority of these animals are used in painful experiments and are left in agony. While many of them die, a few animals survive, but these unfortunate ones wish they could be put out of their misery as well. Although scientists have resources they could use to lower the pain each animal endures and even alternatives of their test subjects, millions of innocent creatures are still suffering. The fact that animals are still used when animal experimentation is avoidable and not necessary makes animal testing unethical.
“The question is not, can they reason, nor, can they talk. But, can they suffer” ( “Harm and Suffering”). Testing on animals has been around since about 1831. It was a thing of the past, researchers and scientists were not sure if there was another way to test new medicines and cosmetics. But now scientists have found an alternative. Animals are usually tested for new vaccines, medicine, cosmetics and more. Animals feel both physical and mental pain, they are also harmed and often killed after the experiment or due to the experiment. They often suffer from food and water deprivation, and forced chemical exposure. Most of which are not protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA). Therefore, animal testing is wrong and inhumane, and should be banned from further experiments.
Animal experimentation has been a big ordeal for many years. Animal testing started for the purpose of medical research of the human body but quickly evolved. As more and more scientists starting testing on animal more people started to debate whether animal testing should stop or not. Some people are will argue that animal testing should be band, but others, like scientists, would argue otherwise. Not everyone will agree with what others have to say about the experiments. Both animals and humans should be able to benefit from these tests in a way that makes everyone happy. Animal experimentation is more complex than most perceive and its leading scientist to find alternative solutions to preserve animal life.