Arguments Against Affirmative Action

1617 Words4 Pages

Affirmative action has made large improvements for people of color in the United States, as it has led to a stronger acknowledgment of historically black universities and created more opportunities for women and people of color in all university settings. Affirmative action is the common name for the piece of legislation: executive order 11246. While affirmative action was originally meant to spearhead the campaign for better treatment of minority groups in the United States, it has not yet fulfilled its entire goal. Affirmative action was put into effect by former president Lyndon Johnson. When he spoke of affirmative action, he spoke of a way to atone for the sins of the government towards black people living in the United States. Affirmative …show more content…

Jim Crow laws were at their height and the racial segregation in the southern United States was taking a turn for the worst. President Lyndon Johnson came into office in 1963 after the assassination of John F. Kennedy. Johnson took office at a time when the country was in emotional turmoil, which would play a large role in his coming years as president. Affirmative action came into law after the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. While it currently has less controversy than it has had in the past, it is still a sensitive topic. From its conception, affirmative action has been utilized as a tool to assist people in minority groups to develop academically, as well as professionally. While all members of minority groups have been the target audience for affirmative action, the group that has reaped the most benefits is white …show more content…

Guidelines were apparently vague enough to work around, and companies who thought they could get away with not complying, did not comply. The lack of enforcement that was prevalent even 10 years after the executive order was put into law was disheartening to local people and heartwarming to large companies. Continuing their argument in the Clearinghouse Review, Galloway and Ronfeldt found that proving a lack of compliance from a company to affirmative action was difficult, because of a legal loophole that allowed lawyers to keep their company records under wraps when they were meant to be public record. What does this mean for people being discriminated against and desperately seeking a job? A lot of companies do not file a formal reason for their lack of hiring, but just tell the candidate they are under qualified when a company could be looking to retain a certain

Open Document