Argumentative Essay: The Ethics Of Euthanasia Of Animals

1176 Words3 Pages

An argument that is particularly hard to argue when it is steeped in morality. However, it is not one that we should ignore. With that being said, there is a morally pressing issue that is deeply important to me: the euthanasia of animals. Specifically I will be discussing the topic of euthanasia to animals in non-critical conditions, meaning cases that do not involve intense medical problems in which the animal suffers a great deal. It is becoming increasingly harder to see the difference between sending an animal to a shelter or simply doing away with them. Though some may view this topic as unimportant, at least some consideration is deserved by this topic. It is a topic that deals with a significant decision. Not everyone is an animal lover …show more content…

In the article “PETA's euthanasia policy casts doubt on their goals,” Josephine Lien questions PETA’s actions and endorsements by saying, “With an annual budget of $37 million dollars, PETA possesses the financial ability to provoke change, an advantage that many groups lack. However, a significant portion of the budget goes toward its infamous celebrity-endorsed campaigns.” (Lien). There is obviously a blatant disregard for the search of a more humane a viable solution. Also, as stated before, their argument for the use of euthanasia was decent, but the sheer amount of it they are willing to use is agitating to the argument. The questionable activities of PETA have not only cast doubt upon their name, but also their arguments towards the endorsement of …show more content…

However, that is not the goal of this argument; it is to find a more stable and humane solution to this overcrowding that plagues the nation’s shelters. There are much more practical and morally satisfying ways of addressing the problem of overcrowding. A very promising example of this would be the work done in the state of Georgia. The statistics regarding Georgia’s euthanasia rates were very grim: “...1997 National Council on Pet Population survey estimated that shelters euthanize 64% of the animals they take in. In 2010, the division began publishing its rate: 79%. Local animal rights activists were less than pleased.” (Brzozowski). However, through the extensive hard work and dedication of Drale Short, the Division’s euthanasia percentage has dropped drastically over the past 5 years (Brzozowski). The significant improvement is a direct result from the Save-A-Pet program. The program implemented and enforced many beneficiary concepts: partnering with rescue groups, developing professional volunteers, preventing reproduction, etc… There’s no point in listing out all the concepts that the program devised because the real message here is that euthanasia prevention can be planned, it can be organized, and it can be implemented. The euthanasia percentage drop this state saw is proof - “Today, at 26%, the division’s euthanasia rate is among the nation’s lowest.”

Open Document