Argumentative Essay On Jack Kevorkian

1499 Words3 Pages

In 1999 a well known physician, Jack Kevorkian, was convicted of second degree murder. One might think that Kevorkian committed the terrible crime of murdering someone, but that is actually far from the truth. Kevorkian was convicted because of something a little unusual; he helped a patient with assisted suicide. Alexander Stingl, a sociologist and science historian, and M. Lee, authors of “Assisted Suicide: An Overview,” define assisted suicide as “any case in which a doctor gives a patient (usually someone with a terminal illness) the means to carry out their own suicide by using a lethal dose of medication.” Kevorkian was convicted because as of right now, assisted suicide is illegal in the United States with the exceptions of Oregon, Montana, and Washington. Huge controversy rose over this case because some feel assisted suicide is a civil right whereas others feel it is unnecessary. Assisted suicide is a practice that has long been debated.
The biggest reason supporting assisted suicide is that should it be an individual’s civil right. Heather Newton, a graduate from …show more content…

If that individual receives quality care and the pain still continues, then assisted suicide would be a fair option for them. On the other hand if the patient is not receiving the care that could make their life better, then assisted suicide should not yet be considered (Quill 58). “No one should choose to die from suffering that could have been relieved if clinicians had the will and expertise” (Quill 58). With skilled physicians it is possible the pain can be reduced, which may lead a patient to realize they do not want to end their life (Quill

Open Document