Argumentative Essay On Bomb Shelter

824 Words2 Pages

The world as you know it is over. A bomb has been dropped, killing over seven billion people and creating an environment that is toxic to humans. Whether it be by chance or miracle, ten select people have survived and managed to get to a bomb shelter. The bomb shelter contains enough supplies for seven people to live until the earth is habitable again. The people are: a minister who is70 years old, a laboratory scientist, an electrician, a female vocalist, an armed policemen, a pregnant woman who is hysterical, the pregnant woman’s husband, a famous writer, a professional athlete, and a high school girl. Your goals are to establish a government, create a viable society, and repopulate the earth. Using this information and logical thinking, I have chosen to kill off the laboratory …show more content…

The gender and age of this person is unknown, so we don’t know if he or she could help with repopulating. This person knows how to fix problems and glitches with electricity, and could possibly help us to get everything back up and running when we leave the bomb shelter. This person could also help if there was something that runs off electricity while in the bomb shelter. The downside to this person is that we do not know if the bomb destroyed the power plants and if electricity over the entire earth was down. If everything was destroyed, this person would have to start up a power plant to get electricity started, which is not including in the education of an electrician. There is also no guarantee that there would be a generator or something the electrician could fix in case of malfunction in the bomb shelter. Just like the laboratory scientist, even if there was something, the person wouldn’t have their tools with them. The seven people could survive without electricity if it became necessary. For these reason, I have decided that the electrician was someone we could get rid of and still be successful in our

Open Document