Argumentative Essay On 9/11

1390 Words3 Pages

Do you ever wonder if what you think happened on 9/11 might not be true? There is some evidence that explosions were used to bring down the Twin Towers. Also, the planes that hit the towers could’ve never actually hit the towers. The government could have let it happen, or even made it happen. In this thrilling essay, I will break down the mainstream consensus of what some people think happened on 9/11, I will explain my personal beliefs on this topic too. There is evidence that the 9/11 Twin Towers were blown up by bombs. Physics teacher, David Chandler, has produced several papers and Internet videos contending that high school physics easily shows that the tower collapses could not have happened from gravity alone. He claims this proves …show more content…

Do some arguments, including the collapses of the towers, alleged evidence of thermite usage at Ground Zero, and the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) 7 (a forty-seven-story building damaged by the fall of WTC 1) “into its own footprint at freefall acceleration,” disprove the mainstream agreement that the September 11, 2001, attacks were the work of Al-Qaeda terrorists using hijacked airplanes? That is the question that America wants an answer to. A film, Loose Change, has basic claims that Flight 77 could not have accounted for the damage at the Pentagon, that the Twin Tower fires were insufficient to cause their collapse, and that cell phone calls from the hijacked airplanes would have been impossible at the time. David Ray Griffin is a theologian whose voluminous writings on 9/11 are frequently cited by other 9/11 theorists. NASA scientist Ryan Mackey has written a very thorough exam of Griffin’s claims. “Once known as Fleischmann and Pons’ competitor for “cold fusion” research in Utah, Steven Jones has written several 9/11 Truth articles.” His work with others (including chemist Niels Harrit of Denmark) on detecting nano thermite in WTC dust is often said as “peer-reviewed research” that proves inside job claims. In the past few years, architect, Richard Gage’s group, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, has provided “Truthers” with the ability to claim that thousands of engineering and …show more content…

I believe the first on because of all the evidence that was given. “Physics teacher, David Chandler, has produced several papers and Internet videos contending that high school physics easily shows that the tower collapses could not have happened from gravity alone.” This quote proves that gravity alone could not have brought down the towers. “Real controlled demolitions commonly use explosives to topple large buildings. However, the trademarks of actual demolitions (the characteristic “boom-boom-boom-boom” sounds and the flashes of high explosives) were completely absent in Manhattan on the morning of September 11, 2001.” This quote shows that they used other substances to make the explosions quieter. “The other part is that WTC 7 resembles a ‘classic controlled demolition’ because it imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint.” This quote is briefly showing that the controlled demolition was, in fact, a part of the 9/11 tower crashes. I believe the second theory because of the lack of negative theories. “Do these intricate arguments, including the rapid collapses of the towers, alleged evidence of thermite usage at Ground Zero, and the collapse of World Trade Center (WTC) 7 (a forty-seven-story building damaged by the fall of WTC 1) “into its own footprint at freefall acceleration,” disprove the mainstream consensus that the September 11, 2001, attacks were the work of al-Qaeda terrorists using

Open Document