In this paper, I will argue that closed borders are morally justifiable. Limits to immigration are often implemented in order to protect a nation's interests, such as protecting the safety of the citizens or preserving welfare funds. In some cases, however, limits to immigration are vital to preserving the culture and preventing overpopulation of a country. Advocates for open borders claim that border restrictions infringe upon one or more basic human rights, such as the freedoms of movement and association (Kukathas 212). I contend, however, that these freedoms do not extend as a right to free immigration. Border restrictions, therefore, do not violate these human rights and are thus morally permissible. One of the most significant reasons …show more content…
The mass migration of immigrants to a developed country can cause the population of that country to increase rapidly. This expansion of population can negatively affect multiple aspects of the country, including its culture, quality of life, and natural environment. An influx of new citizens to a particular area forces the current citizens of that area to change the way that they live. As population density increases, congestion increases. As a result, it becomes more difficult to move from place to place and reduces access to public goods. When a country becomes overpopulated, the demand for goods exceeds the supply, which raises the prices of various commodities including food, shelter, and healthcare. This inflation means that people have to pay more to survive and feed their families. Overpopulation additionally gives rise to unemployment since there are fewer jobs to support a large number of people. The surge in unemployment also increases crime rates as people steal various items to feed their families. These outcomes ultimately lower the quality of life of the citizens of this area, not to mention the destruction to the environment caused by the increased consumption of goods and increase in pollution. There are only a certain number of natural resources in a region, and they get depleted due to overpopulation. The sudden lack of resources per person requires that the citizens …show more content…
This right is significant since it allows a person to make their own life decisions, such as who they want to marry or what religion they want to practice. Each of us has a moral claim to make such important decisions that affect our own lives. Along with our right to the freedom of association, however, comes the right not to associate or to disassociate. Any organization or group of people, therefore, has the right to exclude anyone with whom they do not wish to associate. For example, anyone can choose to practice a particular religion with whomever they wish, and cannot force anyone to join them. Furthermore, people can choose both who they would like to marry and who they do not want to marry. A person is not obliged to associate with everyone who wants to associate with them; they can reject someone else's marriage proposal if they wish. Just as an individual has a right to determine whom they would like to marry, a group of citizens has a right to determine whom it would like to invite into its community. The fundamental right to freedom of association does not imply that any person can associate themselves with any nation they wish. Nations have the right to reject immigrants from entering their borders if they believe that the person will affect the country negatively. This action is a part of their right to disassociate; therefore, it does not violate the individual's
In this short essay I will address the issue of whether or not nations should restrict immigration. It is important to note that my perspective is derived from years of living in an American society. When I speak of immigrants in many cases I’ll be referring to illegal immigrants, as they are the ones to whom the restrictive laws are made in as a preventative means. Additionally, they are the ones people fear and refer to primarily when discussing immigration.
In his address to a joint session of Congress on January 8, 1918, President Woodrow Wilson declared freedom of the seas in times of peace and war. Looking back, it seems ridiculous to think that anyone could challenge the right of individuals to navigate the oceans freely. However, fast-forward to the twenty-first century and we can see an analogous debate over the issue of immigration rights, with territorial borders being the main topic of discussion. The system of immigration in the United States is complex and oftentimes restrictive, and while revisions to the system usually include increasing quotas or other solutions to let in certain groups of people who deserve special consideration (such as those whose skills are needed in a particular field), they are still very limited solutions. The obvious question that arises from letting in some people but not others is that of fairness. Is the accident of birth or luck of being in the right place at the right time enough to justify restrictive citizenship to a select few? I would argue not. I intend to argue that a commitment to human rights entails the position that borders ought to be open in order to guarantee other human rights, especially the right to migrate.
On contemporary society, immigration reform is enjoying an increasingly high voice among people. American immigration system is broken. Too many employers take advantage of the system by hiring undocumented workers which currently are estimated at 11 million. This is not good for the economy nor the country. Imaging a day without these undocumented workers in United States. No bus driver, farm worker, cooker, nurse, construction worker, waiter, house keeper, gardener or nanny can be found. Nobody drive bus, pick fruit, wash dishes, build houses, clean offices or take care of babies. It is not difficult for us to imagine that because these low skill workers have vanished. Chaos and tragedy ensue. The question about whether all nations should open their borders and so we could roam freely, or we should enhance immigration controls is a sophisticated issue. According to the journal article "The new common sense", the author Teresa Hayter declared that the freedom of movement should be the new common sense for immigrants to make big contributions to the wealth and prosperity of the countries they go to. People should have their own right to move freely. The abolition of immigration controls would mean increase in freedom, prosperity and opportunities for all of us.
Wellman, Christopher, and Phillip Cole. Debating the Ethics of Immigration is There a Right ti Exclude?. New York : Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
Overpopulation describes a condition where the number of people uses the resources in a closed environment so that it can no longer maintain that population (Elliot Institute). Around the early 1900 's, the world population had grown to a billion people, and English scholar, Thomas Malthus and partner economists predicted that mankind would outgrow its available resources because a limited amount of land wouldn 't be able to support a population with a limitless potential for growth. Today our population is more than 7 billion. Despite the fact that better health care and medicine along with advances in food production and easier access to freshwater and sanitation have given us the ability to feed ourselves and fight many sickness 's, some
This section will introduce ideas around the politics of migration and open borders, in order to lead us into my critical analysis of migration, the brain drain, and what policies can be created for the best possible outcome. As previously mentioned, brain drain is the only possible clause to which immigration can be restricted. However, only if it causes deleterious effects to the poor nation is it acceptable as a restrictive cause. Nevertheless, restrictive immigration goes against fundamental basic human liberties in which a person has the right to leave one country and go to another. I return to develop the libertarian aspects that advocate for open borders based on Carens understanding of Nozick’s work. Nozick
The increase in population creates a problem where there are more people than available jobs. Corporations take advantage of this and offer jobs with only low pay to save themselves money, because the people are desperate for jobs and will take what they can get (Levin-Waldman). Also the lack of well-paying jobs will cause people to move to other countries to find work. This is seen in how people from Mexico obtain a green card to legally work in jobs in the US to provide money to their families back in Mexico (Levin-Waldman). Also I read a story where a taxi driver in New York sends money monthly to his family in Pakistan. Another way that the economies of countries are affected by global population growth is outsourcing. In this companies move their business to a different country to avoid high taxes and to hire lower paid workers (Levin-Waldman). This is seen in many companies that used to employ US workers are no longer located in the US and manufacture their goods
Immigration is a social movement that has been severely increased by the globalization trends. The free movement of capital, services and people within the EU has contributed greatly to the spreading of the idea of border free movement and demonstrated the benefits of this idea. At the same time, it has also showed the extremes that might be caused by the uncontrolled migration waves. As a result, many states have introduced the laws and regulations that that ban any language other than English, deny government services to undocumented immigrants, and penalize citizens who ”assist” them. Though such measures can be understood, they are viewed more as the restrains for the human freedom and economic growth. It is presumed that the
Overpopulation is having more individuals in certain area compared to the number of available resources. This can result from anything such as an increase in birthrates, immigration or decrease in death rates. While overpopulation shows some good points such as medical development allowing for longer lives but it brings more bad than good. The population density of Rwanda is about 448 people/ km2. The country is a small as Maryland but has almost twice the amount of people. A rapidly growing population such as that calls for a large demand in land use. This also causes an increase in the need of agriculture which increases the need for people to do the labor. Agriculture has spread to very
Immigration is a controversial topic that features conflicting opinions on a global scale. This is because skeptics believe that immigrants are taking away the original culture and traditions of individual societies, whereas, those supporting immigration believe that immigrants in fact enrich the culture of the host countries and provide great benefits to the country overall. This ongoing debate regarding immigration has led to the increased difficulty in gaining national citizenship in some countries, such as Saudi Arabia. Other countries, however, welcome immigrants as they believe foreigners are valuable to society. Immigration around the world should be encouraged as immigrants increase diversity, add to the amount of skills and labor opportunities available to the countries they move to, and improve the economy.
Overpopulation is an issue that majority in the world may never face, however, the ones that do experience this issue know the struggles that it can pose to the overall quality of life. There are multiple reasons on why overpopulation is an issue and why it can affect quality of life, but ones that have a major impact on the world is the shortage of food, overconsumption of fossil fuels, and decline in health care. These specific issues were selected as a result of the widespread availability of information. With over seven billion people on the earth, there are numerous areas that deal with overpopulation, but to classify an area as overpopulated we must first establish what overpopulation actually means. Overpopulation is defined as “an undesirable
The term overpopulation refers to the concept that the number of humans that depend on resources necessary to live is significantly more than the amount of resources which the earth provides[3]. Overpopulation can be caused by a collection of factors. The reduction in the mortality rate, better medical facilities, depletion of precious resources are some factors that have contributed to overpopulation [3]. Our planet is starting to face the effects of the growing population. According to the current annual growth rate, the population is growing by 80 million people every year. That increase will result in 9 billion humans on earth by the year 2038
Over population is a factor in lower life expectancy in fast growing countries. It is projected that in the next 40 years of human growth it will be in less developed areas. This fast population increase will put a strain on that region and make more nonrenewable resources, food, water and housing more competitive which will lead to lower longevity for the native population (Effects of Human Overpopulation). This competition will also lead to less independence and freedom. As populations grow so do the laws that restrict movement in that region. Some examples of this we already see today is water restrictions and gas restrictions such as the 1970’s scare. Another resource that suffers because of overpopulation growth are every day consumables. A study from the website “World Population Balance “was done and stated that if all the 7 billion people consumed as much as the Average American “it would take resources of over five Earths to support all of them.” Each American on average uses biologically productive land totaling near 20
People move because they expect to live a better life but this is not the actual case. There are effects of migration, both good and bad and it affects both migrants and the place that they moved to. Migration attributes to overall growth of the country as more people start working at better wages and leads a better life; get a sense of freedom and individuality, better education and health facilities. Migrants also face a number of challenges after moving into a city, some of them including, proper documentation and identity proof like birth certificate which most rural population do not possess disallowing them to have a bank account, ration card, pan card, school and college admission etc. Housing problems, financial problems and sometimes lack of basic amenities like food, clean water, sanitation and health is also denied to migrants. They often feel a sense of alienation leading to stress, conflicts and negative social impacts. Due to the ever increasing demand for resources, areas becoming more congested, increasing prices for basic amenities, pollution and diseases, poorer migrants living in slums, having low paid jobs are becoming more vulnerable. The pressure on the migrants and the area keeps on increasing. There is no end to this day by day rising problem. If continued, it will lead to scarcity of food in the country as their will be more demand and more environmental changes due to direct land heating and
But high pace of urbanisation has lead to overpopulation to a localised geographical area or a major city. Thus it has resulted in Unemployment and is a critical problem where pace of industrialisation is slow and pace of urbanisation due to migration from rural to urban area is high.