Apostasy Essay

3275 Words7 Pages

Apostasy and Article 11 of the Federal Constitution: Personal Choice or Third Party Confirmation?
1.0 Introduction
“Those who want the government to regulate matters of the mind and spiritual are like men who are so afraid of being murdered that they commit suicide,” said Harry S. Truman. Religion or spiritual belief is a vast idea within the mind of every human being those who believes on his almighty Creator. Freedom of religion and conscience is the oldest version of internationally recognized human rights which is purely touches on individual liberty. Protection against freedom of religion was granted as early as before the civilization evolved. In a lexical meaning, religion is a belief or faith towards the Almighty and the freedom to profess a religion of his/her choice became a debate among many people in this civilized world.
Based on the above notion, choice of the religion or changing of spiritual belief known as “apostasy” or renunciation of a religious faith means conversion from Islam to another faith became a sensitive issue in many countries and Malaysia is not an exception to it. Article 11 of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia stated that, “Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion.” However, this article imposed a restriction to propagate any religious belief among persons professing the religion of Islam via subsection (4) of the same article due to the special privilege owed by the religion of Islam as a religion of Federation under the Article 3 of the said constitution.
Upholding restrictions and using connotations of freedom of religion under the supreme law of Malaysia raise many questions among human right claimers whether Malaysia emphasis the real sense of religious freedom or i...

... middle of paper ...

...gulations which are violating should be considered by the courts without fear and must be fair decision. In other words, even since 1988 the judiciary in crisis for a fairer separation of power, but on religious issue particularly, a neutral decision must be made and do not give any room for political enrolment into their decision making power. Thus, in paraphrasing the religious freedom and apostasy whether “it is a personal choice or third party choice?” the whole events clearly shows that it is no more to be a personal choice. Other factors and elements controlled our rights for religion alternation or practices. Even without the renunciation, practicing own religion do not get proper reputation in certain instances. In a multi-ethnic society, tolerance are very much vital to maintained and understand the religious belief for long term unity and progressment.

Open Document