Antony Vs. Brutus

595 Words2 Pages

Antony vs. Brutus Antony and Brutus had good speeches that persuaded the crowd. They both made good points in their speeches to persuade the crowd to be on their side. Although they made good points and Brutus is who the people naturally follow Antony's speech was more successful than Brutus’s. How persuasive their speeches were can be compared to Bill Clinton's and George W. Bush's debate in 1992. Brutus is like George Bush and Antony is like Clinton. Clinton talked personally with the crowd getting closer to them meanwhile Bush just stood by his chair and talked to the crowd. Brutus's speech was defending himself for killing Caesar. In Act III Sc. 2 Brutus says, “ not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” (ln. 20). He also defends himself by asking in Act III Sc. 2 “ …show more content…

Antony’s speech started out with good words about Brutus who later turned into sarcasm because he repeated them so much. In Act III Sc. 2 Antony says, “He was my friend, faithful and just to me. But Brutus says he was ambitious, and Brutus is an honorable man.” (ln. 84-86). That was the first evidence of sarcasm that Antony showed. He talked about how Caesar was ambitious according to Brutus who is an honorable man and how he brought captives to Rome who had brought more wealth into the city. Later in the speech Antony persuaded the crowd by bringing up Caesar's will which everyone wanted to hear about. Antony made everyone think that he wasn’t going to read the will which got everyone interested and begging him to read it. Later, he finally told the people about the will and he concluded his speech by making them angry and bloodthirsty. Antony showed the people where Casca, Cassius, and Brutus had stabbed Caesar. He got them riled up by showing them the worst stab of all which was made by Brutus and he told them how that stab was stronger than the violence of

Open Document