Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Robert kelley followership theory
Followership theory robert
Case studies on followership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
It seems self-evident that one cannot be a leader unless he or she has followers; put differently, one cannot hold a leadership role unless others are prepared to hold followership roles. These roles are more or less symbiotic - done effectively, each role can support and benefit the other. Nevertheless, the term “follower” has acquired a negative connotation, and leadership is generally considered to be the pinnacle to which we should all strive in our working lives, if not our personal lives as well. However, thanks to the work of authors such as Robert E. Kinney, who introduced the concept of followership, the characteristics, roles and paths of followers now receive increased attention. Kinney’s groundbreaking article, “In Praise of Followers”, appears along with the work of other authors on followership in The Leaders Companion. In keeping with our current awareness of followership, none of the authors in The Leader’s Companion debates the importance of followers in the leader-follower relationship. However, some (discussed below) differ in their definitions of followers and in their focus on the role of followership. This essay attempts to draw together some key ideas about followership, taken from several authors in The Leader’s Companion, with a focus on Robert Kinney’s contributions to the study of followership. Next, I will discuss some of Kinney’s subsequent work and his continuing contribution, not just to our evolving understanding of followership, but to its practical applications in a variety of contexts. The features of followers In “Leaders and Followers”, Gardner (1987) poses a number of questions about interactions between leaders and followers. These include the degree of structure versus informality, con... ... middle of paper ... ...e Leader’s Companion (pp. 185-188). New York: Simon & Schuster. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. (n.d.) Situational Leadership. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 207-211). New York: Simon & Schuster. Kelley, R.E. (1988). In Praise of Followers. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 193-204). New York: Simon & Schuster. Kelley, R.E. (1992). Followership. In Goethals, G.R., Sorenson, G.J. & Burns, J.M. (Eds.). (2008). Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 504-513). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Kelley, R.E. (2008). Rethinking Followership. In Riggio, R., Chaleff, I. & Lipman-Blumen, J. (Eds.). (2008). The Art of Followership (pp. 5-16). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Rost, J.C. (1991). Leaders and Followers are the People in this Relationship. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 189-192). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Great followership is a reflection of great
Thousands of years ago, leadership, authority, structure, and rules were the basis of the Bible and Hammurabi’s Code. These set in stone that era’s belief in a reward-based system to incentivize people to work, and obey. You followed the rules, you were rewarded; you didn’t, and you were punished. During the classical era of Homer, Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates, great leaders were educated and experienced in strategic planning, goal setting, critical thinking, and having great communication to their followers, who in turn became great leaders themselves. During this era, we begin to see the nuances of an integral part of transformational leadership: the impact your followers can have on your individual success as a leader. Plato said that
Lipman-Blumen, J. & Blumen, J. (2005). The 'Secondary' of the 'Se The Allure of Toxic Leaders. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
In an age when culture continues to lower standards of intellect, Marva Dawn makes compelling observations and suggestions for the Church to rethink its strategy on impacting society. How do we evangelize without weakening the message of what we are communicating? The majority of her text focuses on the worship environment generally, but later she focuses on music, preaching, and liturgy specifically. According to Dawn, a gathering of believers should emphasize God as the subject and object of worship, challenge each individual to grow in godly character, and accentuate the community of believers (not only in the room, but throughout history as well). Through this grid, she encourages leaders and participants to evaluate each worship element.
Ewens A (2002). The nature and purpose of leadership. In E Hawkins, C Thornton (Eds). Six
Kellerman’s theories examine followers not as subordinates, but as co-participants in leadership (Ekundayo, Damhoeri, & Ekundayo, 2010). Thus she focuses as much on the followers as the leadership it is trying to unlock. She sees followers as defined by their level of engagement extending from isolationists to diehards (Kellerman, 2007). By defining these followers, according to Kellerman, leaders can quickly determine the nature of the leader-follower relationship. This provides leaders with information on how much or little their followers are invested in the organization they are involved.
Hinojosa, A. S., Davis McCauley, K., Randolph-Seng, B., & Gardner, W. L. (2014). Leader and follower attachment styles: Implications for authentic leader–follower relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 595–610. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.12.002
...odology through which leaders oppose the organization of followers. There is no motivation to accept that leaders stand up to this organization short of what followers do, other than in light of the "naturalization" of scholarly sees on the imperviousness to change that see it as a sensation that only influences followers (Imprint and Goldberg, 1999). At the point when one takes a gander at the leadership process from the devotee's side, one may get an alternate picture. At last, followers' engagement with leadership movements is not so much positive for organizations. Activity and impact can actually be utilized to attain objectives that are not authorized by the organization and counter those that are. In this respect, there is no contrast between leadership pushed by leaders and impact pushed by followers: each one can generate either great or terrible results.
The duty of all organizations or corporations is to ensure effective camaraderie, and use their resources to comprehend the nature of a follower and what makes them function effectively. At some points in our careers we find ourselves as leader’s weather it is for a project or an assignment. In that particular time we depend on our groups to work to the best of
The concept of followership states that good followers understand their leader’s goals and objectives, the pressures he faces, what his strengths and weaknesses are, and perhaps most critically where his blind ...
Paradigm shifts has changed the focus of leadership from the individual to “a relational process.” I think this change was necessary to acknowledge the fact that leaders generally have a team of supporters who help them achieve their goals. It is good that no one person gets all the credit for the effort of an entire group of dedicated yet unrecognized people. I believe that people’s underappreciation of these “backstage workers” contributes to the reduction of their roles and status. The term “followers” is generally neutral, but it can also have a slightly negative connotation. Because of this, I support that people are beginning to call them “constituents” or “co-creators”
According to Sherman (2012), followers greatly contribute to the success of their leaders, and one must give their participation, support, acceptance of the challenge, open communication, trust and give their feedbacks. Behind every successful leader is a motivated and responsible follower.
(3) the type of relationship that exists between the leader and the followers (leader-member acceptance)
It is important to remember that followers can also wield a considerable amount of power and influence, and that followers also use a variety of influence tactics to change the attitudes, values, beliefs,
Another author that has investigated the followership topic but asserts a few qualifications between her work and others is Kellerman. She characterizes her work as more descriptive than prescriptive as she considers there must be such a variety of variables impacting the followers behaviors that it is hard to be instructive. According to Kellerman (2008), there are two conceivable definitions about followers: “Followers can be defined by their rank: They are subordinates who have less power, authority, and influence then do their superiors”. And “followers can also be defined by their behavior: they go along with what someone else wants and intends”. Kellerman (2008) uses rank and behavior as determinants to characterize followers, focusing