Anne Hutchinson Social Norms

1219 Words3 Pages

Social Norms of Women, Race and Gender within English and Slave Populations
Social norms are judgements based on guidelines or stereotypes that are considered and shown to be correct or allowed in a group or society of people. Though if these norms are not followed or abided by, citizens have consequences which in most cases leads to jail time, being shunned or even the worst consequence - death. Right from the womb a baby is identified with a gender, skin color, and social classification. Anne Hutchinson, slaves, and servants or underclass populations went against social norms and disregarded proper boundaries. Social norms then are put into place against the inferior gender, race and social class.
.Anne Hutchinson was an English woman who …show more content…

Though when slavery and servanthood was occurring this is how they characterized humans and how they decided on superiority. This idea of race then created the discrimination between the English folk and the Native American descents. The words used toward these individuals of different color was so demeaning and horrible to see. Alonso de Zuazo stated that the Negro slaves were needed to be sent over to him in the New World. He was downgrading when speaking of the slaves and talked about making them learn the customs. He even goes forth to mention that it is rare that the stronger slaves die, but when you consider all the work they did, the torture they received and the trip they made to come over here many of them died. As Elizabeth Sprigs points out her life as an indentured servant was terrible when she went against social norm by disobeying or not putting full commitment into her task, she was “tied up and whipp’d to that Degree that you’d not serve an Animal” (Sprigs 3). Social norms were based on liberties of the servants that were created by the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, theses laid out four different liberties that each servant should receive from their owner (Massachusetts Body of Liberties 1). So comparing the liberties document to Ms. Sprig’s letter you notice a wide difference and see how better off it was for servants who got these. Liberties included running away and bringing back servant as soon …show more content…

Demographic or racial stereotypes seem to point out the view that English white men were higher in society than Native Americans. about husband and wife here – men had a higher class than women did and were the ones who most of the time made the money and made the decisions while they left the wife at home to do chores and most of the time to be bossed around (SUM UP). Men in the colonial white class were ones who created laws for the slaves and servants, protecting themselves (Foner). Englishmen made laws to protect themselves from the slaves. Slaves were in a need for freedom and desired this idea, so at times they would try and rebel against their masters, So then laws were made to point out that slaves couldn’t own guns and couldn’t act out toward his or her master. These laws however weren’t always followed by the English men; slaves master were not able to harm them to where they lose a part of their body or are tortured. Many masters went into court and told the judges that their slave’s injury was an accident. Slaves were often beat so poorly that they broke an arm and lost teeth, and most of the time judges would rule on the master’s side (Massachusetts Body of Liberties 1). Social norms were put into play in these courts where judges were against slaves and made sure they were shown what they deserved as

Open Document