Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Ethical dilemmas in research essays
Ethical dilemmas in research essays
Negative impacts of animal testing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Ethical dilemmas in research essays
Research is responsible for virtually all the medical breakthroughs there have been- there are medicines and vaccines and cures and treatments and more life saving benefits being developed today- but an important factor to the development of medical advances is the inclusion of animals in research. Virtually almost everyone alive has benefited from the medical advances made feasible through animal testing. According to my aunt Blanca, who is a mother of a child who was diagnosed with severe epilepsy says, “We should be thankful and supportive of animal testing” (Perez). When I questioned her whether she believed testing animals was cruel she said, “Nobody wishes for animals to be used in this form, and I believe animals should be used only for medical research and when there is no other method. I am a mother so I find it hard to believe and accept that any parent would be against or have issues with animal research.” Although my aunt’s daughter has been left with learning disabilities for the rest of her life, my aunt is grateful because without effective medicines her daughter could have not only been worse but possibly could have died. Although extremists argue that animal testing is cruel and unnecessary, animal testing is justifiable when regarding animal testing as a vital role in medical advances that save lives. Animal research is responsible for profound eruditions that have served as a foundation for medical advancements. In virtually every major medical advance for both human and veterinary health, animal research has played a vital role. According to the U.S. based Foundation for Biomedical Research, “From antibiotics to blood transfusions, from dialysis to organ transplantation from vaccinations to chemotherapy, bypas... ... middle of paper ... ...7): 44+. General Reference Center. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. "Medical Advances through Animal Research." University of Minnesota. Regents of the University of Minnesota, 15 Jun 2006. Web. 22 Nov 2013. Orlans, F. Barbara. "Policy issues in the use of animals in research, testing, and education." The Hastings Center Report May-June 1990: S25+. General Reference Center. Web. 20 Nov. 2013. Purchase, Iain. "Experimental animal research." Biological Sciences Review Jan. 2001: 26. General Reference Center. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. Roush, Wade. "Hunting for animal alternatives." Science 274.5285 (1996): 168+. General Reference Center. Web. 19 Nov. 2013. Southwick, Ron. "Fighting for Research on Animals." The Chronicle of Higher Education 48.31 (2002). General Reference Center. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. "Speaking of Research." Pushing Forward for Pro-Test Science. N.p., 2009. Web. 22 Nov. 2013.
Loeb, Jerod M. “Human vs. Animal Rights: In Defense of Animal Research.” Taking Sides: Science, Technology, and Society. Gilford: Dushkin Publishing Group, 2011
The information that animals have provided scientists over the past decades has changed society, and is still changing society for the better. Millions of lives have been saved with the use of animal testing and many more will be saved with continued research. However, there are many who dismiss this monumental achievement completely and oppose the use of animals in laboratory research. Though many find this practice to be
STATEMENT OF USE: “Although many key questions can still only be answered by animal studies, non-animal methods now account for 90% of medical research and include mathematical and computer models, advanced tissue and cell cultures, and scanning technology.” This information will take a great stance in my paper once more research is done about it. Animals do not need to be used to understand biomedical medicine and knowledge. They are not models for anything society taunts them to be. (76
League, Animal Defense. “Policy Statement on Animal Research.” Civil Rights in America. Woodbridge, CT: Primary Source Media, 1999. American Journey.Student Resources in Context. Web. 6 Feb. 2014.
"Animal Research Alternatives" The American Anti-Vivisection Society. N.p., 21 Jan. 2009. Web. 13 Jan. 2014.
Historically, the use of animals for experimental purposes dates back to early Greek physician-scientists. Aristotle and Galen both conducted experiments on animals in an effort to contribute to our understanding of science and medicine.1 Claude Bernard later established animal experimentation as part of the scientific method. Known as the father of physiology, Bernard stated that “experiments on animals are entirely conclusive for the toxicology and hygiene of man. The effects of these substances are the same on man as on animals, save for differences in degree.”1 Bernard’s work strongly influenced the use of animals in biomedical research, which has become a common, and often required, practice today. The American Medical Association (AMA)...
Evans, Kim Masters. "Research Animals." Animal Rights. 2009 ed. N.p.: n.p., 2014. N. pag. Student Resources In Context. Web. 8 Apr. 2014.
In modern society, animal experimentation has triggered a controversy; consequently, vast amount of protests have been initiated by the animal rights community. Although these organizations have successfully broadcasted their concerns toward animal experimentation, its application continues to survive. Sally Driscoll and Laura Finley inform that there remain fifty million to one-hundred million animals that experience testing or experimentation throughout the world on a yearly basis. But despite opposition, animal experimentation, the use of experiments on animals in order to observe the effects an unknown substance has on living creatures, serves multiple purposes. Those particular purposes are: research of the living body, the testing of
Wolff, Jonathan. "Pro and Con Positions Oversimplify Animal Experimentation Issues."Animal Experimentation. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford, Jr. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. At Issue. Rpt. from "Killing Softly." Guardian. 28 Mar. 2006. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 Mar. 2014.
Clemmitt, Marcia. "Animal Rights." CQ Researcher by CQ Press. N.p., 10 Jan. 2010. Web. 27
"Speak Out for Species (S.O.S) - Animals Used in Experiments and Testing." University of Georgia. Web. 14 Dec. 2009. .
Rick Bogle Alliance for Animals. "It Is Time to Revisit Experimentation on Animals." Wisconsin State Journal, 7 08 2013, All ed., The Cap Times: n. pag. eLibrary. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.
“Animals were used in early studies to discover how blood circulates through the body, the effect of anesthesia, and the relationship between bacteria and disease” (AMA 59). Experiments such as these seem to be outdated and actually are by today’s means, scientists now commonly study for three general purposes: (1) biomedical and behavioral research, (2) education, (3) drug and product testing (AMA 60). These three types of experiments allow scientists to gain vast amounts of knowledge about human beings.... ... middle of paper ... ...& Co.
"Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals." AALAS Foundation. 2005. American Association for Laboratory Animal Science. 2012 .
Orlans, F. Barbara. In the Name of Science:Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford UP: Oxford UP, 1993.