Andrew Sullivan Here Comes The Bedroom Analysis
analytical Essay
480 words
The author of this article Here Comes the Groom by Andrew Sullivan, makes a good argument about same sex marriage and gay relationships .The author feels that gay people should have the same rights and privileges that straight couples have when it comes to being in a relationship or even when being married Sullivan’s has a very accurate argument on this topic and I like the way Sullivan differs his point respectfully. I think he makes a strong moral argument for his position, which has lead me to agree with him on this topic. Sullivan uses one particular type of reasoning throughout the first paragraph, “domestic partnership”. To show that gay partners in the judicial system and America is less then married. Which employs the author’s argument …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan's article, here comes the groom, makes a good argument about same sex marriage and gay relationships.
- Analyzes how sullivan uses 'domestic partnership' to show that gay partners in the judicial system and america are less than married.
- Analyzes how manipulates the emotions of the reader. he addresses many points and sides on why gays should be able to marry and have the same benefits as straight people.
- Concludes that if society stops being so binary about gay marriage and same sex relations, it might bridge the gap between gays and their parents.
The author addresses many points and sides on why gays should be able to marry and have the same benefits as straight people in a relationship. One of Sullivan arguments’ is that straight couples don’t have go through any proofing about their relationship, so it’s discriminating to make gay couples have to prove themselves to society in order to be equal. Shown in paragraph thirteen the author says, “But even the most harden conservatives recognize that gays are a permanent minority and likely to go away (pg. 491)”. Then lastly the author employs common ground, that since it’s become more acceptable for gays to come out openly about their sexuality, It would also, end the wake of AIDS, as a unpretentious public health measure. “To be gay and to be bourgeois no longer seems such an absurd proposition. Certainly, since Aids, to be gay and to be responsible has become a necessity (pg. 489)”. The author concludes that if society stops being so binary about gay marriage and same sex relations have the same privileges and benefits as a straight marriage, it might bridge the gap between gays and their parents. “It could do as much to heal the gay-straight rift as any amount of gay rights legislation (pg.491)”. I mean who wants to feel like they’re in outsider just because of their choice on sexuality and the family want have the traditional type of family. After all everybody wants to have a family and have their family by them for support when making this life changing
Related
- analytical
- opinionated
- Let Gays Marry and Leave Marriage Aloneanalytical essaySullivan's article argues, "Gay men and lesbians are citizens, entitled, like everyone else, to equal protection-no special rights, but simple equality" (p. 25). He writes that gay men and women want to marry for the same reason that straight people want to marry, for love. Sullivan writes, "And we (gay men and women) want to commit to that person in front of our family and country for the rest of our lives" (p. 25). He goes on to write that letting gays marry would not change the rights of others, ?Throughout American history, marriage has been between a man and a woman, and in many ways our society is built upon that institution. But none of that need change in the slightest? (p. 25). The definition of marriage has changed so much in the past years that it should change to include same sex marriages. Sullivan writes, "We changed (the definition of marriage) because we recognized that human dignity is the same whether you are a man or a woman, black or white. And no one has any more of a choice to be gay than to be black or white or male or female" (p. 26). The point has been brought up that marriage is between a man and a woman for procreation but there are men and women who...
In this essay, the author
- Explains that andrew sullivan's article, "let gays marry," is about equal rights on marriage for same sex couples, while william bennett, writes about marriage and the meaning of marriage.
- Analyzes how sullivan's article argues that gay men and lesbians are citizens, entitled to equal protection-no special rights, but simple equality
- Analyzes how bennett's article argues that legalizing same-sex marriage would stretch the definition of marriage beyond recognition and more attempts would be made to expand it.
- Argues that the legal union of same-sex couples would shatter the conventional definition of marriage, change the rules which govern behavior, endorse practices which are completely antithetical to the tenets of all of the world?s major religions, and obscure marriage's enormously consequential function-procreation and child-rearing.
- Analyzes how bennett argues that sullivan has effectively lost the capacity to draw any lines and make moral distinctions. he believes homosexuals should resist allowing their?varied and complicated lives? to be flattened into a single, moralistic model.
- Explains that marriage is an honorable estate, instituted of god and built on moral, religious, sexual and human realities. it is based on a natural teleology, on the different, complimentary nature of men and women.
- Concludes that bennett's debate is an indication of how steep our moral slide has been. we as americans can do whatever we want, but we need to put limits on what is important to us.
- Compares the views of the two authors on same-sex marriage. both articles have good points that can easily change one's way of thinking about the issue.
- Analyzes how each author's article appeals differently to the reader. sullivan appealed to an emotional side of a reader’s heart, while bennett was more reasonable and not as gripping.
- Opines that sullivan and bennett had great positions for their arguments about same-sex marriage and either article can easily persuade the reader.
1022 wordsRead More - Should Gays Marry?analytical essayAndrew Sullivan’s essay, “Let Gays Marry,” is about how gays and lesbians have long been alienated from their basic rights as American citizens. He argues that allowing gays to marry will not drastically change the description of marriage as we know it, but will simply entitle same sex partners to devote themselves to each other, and declare their love for each other.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the essays by william bennett and andrew sullivan are just the tip of the iceberg in the debate over homosexual marriage.
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan's essay, "let gays marry," is about how gays and lesbians have long been alienated from their basic rights as american citizens.
- Analyzes how sullivan argues that america has been doing by not legally recognizing domestic partners of the same sex.
- Analyzes how sullivan recognizes that many religious organizations are against homosexuality, but this country has a separation of church and state that makes that argument arbitrary in terms of legality.
- Argues that allowing gays to marry would be another revision for the better, not a radical change in the institution.
- Analyzes sullivan's argument that marriage is for raising children, but many married couples have none. the doles and the buchanans are conservative families.
- Analyzes how bennett's article, "leave marriage alone," is about how marriage is a sacred tradition. he believes that broadening the definition to include gays will alter the purpose and meaning of marriage.
- Argues that allowing gays to marry would go against every major religion of the world.
- Analyzes how bennett wants to know why andrew sullivan feels his cause is worthy, but not that of a bisexual who wishes for polygamy. bennett believes that changing the definition of marriage to include homosexuals would open the floodgates for all kinds of deviant behavior.
- Explains that bennett believes that marriage is not an arbitrary construct that can be redefined by those who lay claim to it, but rather an honorable estate built on moral, religious, sexual and human realities.
- Analyzes the similarities between the two essays, despite the conflicting viewpoints. sullivan and bennett discuss the ramifications of broadening the definition of marriage to include gays
- Analyzes how each essay discusses different definitions of marriage, stating that people generally frown upon homosexuality, mostly from religious viewpoints. a change to include gays could cause individuals who practice less desirable lifestyles to demand that they be included in the new definition.
- Analyzes how both men present arguments representing different sides of the spectrum, but they share many points throughout their essays, making it difficult for many people to choose a side.
833 wordsRead More - Who Should Be the Determining Factor?analytical essayIn the essay, “Let Gays Marry,” by Andrew Sullivan, there were a few main arguments stated. In the document, Sullivan claims that gays and lesbians want the government to enable the law so it lets gays get married. They presented themselves in front of the Supreme Court and in fact, this was the first time they actually got some acknowledgment. Gays and lesbians are going to want to be together (some are lucky enough to meet that special someone), basically why not give them the right to be an equal citizen? The fact that churches do not want them to get married is not the focus; the difference is that Sullivan wants the government to take action. He’s simply asking for the government’s approval to allow a civil marriage. No one has the choice to be white, black, female, male, gay, hetero, etc. As a response to Bill Bennett,...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the two arguments represent the pros and cons of gay marriage, and why gays should be allowed to be married.
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan's essay, "let gays marry," claims that gays and lesbians want the government to enable the law so they can get married.
- Analyzes how william bennett wrote a response to sullivan's passage, "leave marriage alone." he believes same sex unions will break or shatter the conventional marriage and stretch the definition of marriage beyond its limits.
- Explains that the supreme court recognized the gay marriage issue without looking down at it. the reasons for gays wanting to marry are the same reasons anyone else wants to. bennett believes that because of religion and human realities it should not be endorsed.
- Analyzes how bennett's argument about procreation and child-rearing is untrue. sullivan wants gays to be as happy as heterosexuals when married.
- Analyzes how there were misconceptions and boundaries that were crossed in these two arguments. the contrast and summarizing was the main outcome of the essay.
984 wordsRead More - Homosexuality and Human Rightsopinionated essayIn conclusion, gay marriage should be allowed in the United States because it supports the idea of equal rights, and it would do no harm to children with homosexual parents, or society. When gays are denied marriage, not only are they denied that right, but many other rights as well. This is completely unacceptable. By making gay marriage legal, the government is setting up a world in which everyone is balanced. This is one of the true next steps in making the world more fair, and ensuring that the future society is more open-minded than today’s. That is one thing that everyone can certainly work towards together, without a doubt.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that gay marriage should be allowed in the united states because it supports the idea of equal rights, the effectiveness of children with homosexual parents, and this act would do no harm to society.
- Opines that the bill of rights contains ten amendments, including the right to separation of church and state. religion is no longer disregarded, but is pushed to the forefront.
- Opines that by legalizing gay marriage, gays have a chance to experience this immense joy of being accepted by everyone and not have to hide their relationship or be ridiculed.
- Opines that anything less than full marriage equality is second-class status for gays and lesbians.
- Explains that marriage is not the only right that gays want, but any other rights that they are entitled to. the us general accounting office found that exactly 1, 138 federal benefits are granted to married couples.
- Opines that equal rights have been a problem in the workplace. many people won't hire homosexuals for illegitimate reasons they claim are real.
- Opines that homosexuals want children, despite adoption by one or both partners, surrogate mothers, or donated sperm. people opposing this decision believe they are endangering their welfare.
- Explains that parents' orientation has no measureable effect on a child's social development, and that the government supports all heterosexual marriages whether or not they are children-ready.
- Explains that a parent's orientation has no effect on schooling, and that homosexual parents don't affect grades. they compare 15 three- to nine-year-olds born to lesbian couples to those from heterosexual mothers.
- Explains that children with gay parents are treated the same way as those with heterosexual, divorced, and non-married parents.
- Opines that homosexuals cause no harm to society because they are homophobic and liberal.
- Explains that homosexual relationships turn into serious, long-term partnerships, supported by the fact that there are hundreds of gay couples waiting to be married.
- Analyzes how the government claims that domestic partnerships and civil unions should be suffice. however, couples with legal civil partnerships do not take their benefits with them when they cross their state's boundaries.
- Opines that if gay marriage is legal in america, the benefits will be endless. the older crowd has the biggest problem with homosexuals, while the younger crowd seems more accepting.
- Concludes that gay marriage should be allowed in the us because it supports the idea of equal rights, and it would do no harm to children with homosexual parents, or society.
1376 wordsRead More - Do Gays and Lesbians Threaten the System of Male Dominance?analytical essayA debate is raging in America about who people have a right to marry. In response to lesbians and gays asking for the right to marry, many legislators are writing laws to ban same-sex marriage in their respective states. Even President Bush supports a Constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage (prez.bush.marriage/). Opponents of such legislation do not want discrimination passed into law and are protesting at every opportunity. One must understand the reasons that people want to ban same-sex marriage before he or she can effectively argue about the subject. Many advocates of same-sex marriage bans say that allowing gays and lesbians to marry would degrade the institution of marriage because marriage is only supposed to exist between a man and woman. In addition, allowing same-sex marriage would cause problems for society (Issues and Controversies on File). One theory why opponents may fight against same-sex marriages is that heterosexual marriages have long reinforced traditional gender roles within marriage and that allowing same-sex marriages would cause males to lose their authority to subordinate females as heterosexual couples begin to model same-sex marriage gender equality (Calhoun 157).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that gays and lesbians threaten the system of male dominance by not complying with their assigned gender roles.
- Argues that the traditional argument against same-sex marriage bans states that marriage is defined as the emotional and spiritual union of a man or woman.
- Argues that homosexuals have enjoyed the right to marry throughout recorded history, though there have been restrictions placed over who could marry.
- Argues that the concept of the natural family is a roadblock in the path to homosexual rights.
- Argues that the positive repercussions of same-sex marriage add momentum to gay and lesbian activists' arguments.
- Explains that gender differences are irrelevant in same-sex marriages, so there are no gender roles that can seem discriminatory and thus the relationships are more egalitarian.
- Argues that homosexuality is linked to sexist ideas of proper male and female behavior.
- Analyzes the arguments against same-sex marriage bans in hawaii. they argue that the best environment to raise children is in a heterosexual marriage.
- Argues that homosexuality is harmful, but society's treatment of gays and lesbians leads to depression and suicide, not the actual homosexual acts.
- Opines that promiscuity makes heterosexuals and homosexuals have a higher risk of getting disease. they argue that if society was worried about gay and lesbians not having monogamous relationships, they could allow them to marry and there would be incentives not to divorce
- Argues that the defense of marriage act's proponents did not compare heterosexuals and homosexuals. they argued that any efforts to redefine marriage would destroy the institution.
- Explains that people confuse a church's right to marry with the government’s responsibility to issue marriage licenses to all citizens without discrimination.
- Argues that the slippery slope argument against anti-miscegenation laws is still ineffective today. they argue that homosexual marriages hurt the sanctity of marriage because they do not fight television shows that trivialize marriage.
- Opines that for equality to exist for gays and lesbians, their way of life must be more than tolerated. culture needs to give up the view that homosexuals are unfit for marriage, parenting, and family.
- Cites the bibliography on et ux. v. virginia: feminism, the family, and the politics of the closet.
- Cites corvino, john, levin, michael e. sexual orientation and human rights. rowman & littlefield: new york, 1999.
2249 wordsRead More - For Gay Marriageanalytical essayIn the article, Sullivan’s argument is that the focal point of a marriage contract is an emotional, financial, and psychological bond between two people. Liberals are of the opinion heterosexuals and homosexuals are exactly the same on this point, as neither is more or less capable of making this connection. Gays and lesbians are also no more prone than heterosexuals in not upholding their fidelity in a union, or divorcing or separating. Liberals want the people to see that heterosexual couples have been failing at making marriage work for decades, perhaps longer. Thus, their logic would lead to the fact that homosexual couples should not have to prove that they can succeed, any person who loves their partner should be given the opportunity to make the sacrifices and commitment it takes to make marriage work.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan's article, "for gay marriage," tries to persuade conservatives about the emotional, financial, and psychological bond between two people.
- Analyzes sullivan's argument that the focal point of a marriage contract is an emotional, financial, and psychological bond between two people.
- Analyzes how sullivan could overcome the ambiguity of his presentation by citing more concrete studies that support his key points.
- Analyzes how sullivan contradicts his earlier claim about childbearing by comparing heterosexual couples to homosexual couples.
- Analyzes how sullivan's claim about the relative importance of legalizing gay marriage is invalid because of lack of support.
664 wordsRead More - Comparing Two Views of Gay Marriageanalytical essayAndrew Sullivan says that love is the reason people marry one another. No matter the race, creed, or gender love is a strong bond that few people are lucky enough to find. (Sullivan p.25) This country believes in equal rights and opportunities. With this being true all people should be able to choose whom they love and get to marry. Homosexuals do not seek special treatment but an equal and full part in America. (Sullivan p. 25) In a society that always talks of equal rights and opportunity, is it right for the country to condemn these people because they are different in their beliefs of sexuality? One of the conventional ideas as to why people of opposite sex marry is because of procreation. What about all of the married couples who do not have children? Should they not be able to be married? (Sullivan p. 26) Sullivan says that over the years the definition of marriage has changed several times. It has been amended or changed to the times. Women in the marriage were once legal property to their husbands, and at one time only people of the same race could marry. (Sullivan p. 26) Should this instance be any different?
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan and william bennett talk about same-sex marriages in their works. both believe that marriage is based off of tradition, but debate if they should be allowed.
- Analyzes how andrew sullivan says that love is the reason people marry one another, and that the country believes in equal rights and opportunities.
- Analyzes how bennett's essay, " leave marriage alone," states that marriage is a sacred tradition. allowing same sex marriages would change everything from behavior to the way the youth is raised.
- Analyzes how bennett and sullivan disagree on what tradition is but they believe that the contract of marriage is based on tradition.
- Opines that everyone has the right and freedoms to do what he or she pleases, but there are boundaries. tolerations for groups are one of the great things this country offers as opposed to other countries.
835 wordsRead More - Analysis Of The Book 'Shame Isn T Normal'analytical essayHis point is that the marriage campaign is assimilation into straight culture and it’s a rejection of non-traditional queer lifestyles which is a very radical view to take. The heterosexual people who reject gay marriage are, in his framework, protecting the sanctity of their marriage by wanting their marriage to be holy and without shame at the expense of others. There are so many rights that fall under marriage itself that every person who wants to get marriage deserves to have no matter who what their identity that it’s interesting as a whole how against it he is. However, he does say that “pursuing same sex marriage as a strategy fails to address the privilege of spousal status that is the core of the problem” because marriage “reinforces all of the other damaging hierarchies of shame around sex.” Marriage does allow the government system to regulate relationships and justifies the enforcement of sexual relationships by requiring certain steps to legitimize the relationship. He argues that if (when) gay marriage becomes legalized, those whose relationships had become legitimized would become less shameful and the shame would get worse for unmarried or untraditional
In this essay, the author
- Opines that has had no exposure to asexuality or the concept of people who have no or minimal interest, or simply believes that it doesn't exist or doesn’t belong in the queer community.
- Argues that gay marriage is assimilation into straight culture and a rejection of non-traditional queer lifestyles.
- Analyzes how warner's book revolves around societal pressures surrounding sex and how it encompasses every aspect of queer people’s lives.
- Argues that assimilation and rejection of societal norms are necessary to survive as a queer person in this society.
- Analyzes how dismisses legal activism as being lower in a hierarchy than traditional activism.
1686 wordsRead More - Gay Marriage Essayanalytical essay...ets down to “value judgment” and how the LBG’s are being hypocritical in a way of advocating that value judgment about marriage is wrong. But yet, they insist that same sex unions might as well be considered marriages on a par with heterosexual marriages; LBG’s making a value judgment about marriages, both their own marriages and those of others. “Rather, they press their judgments on others while, at the same time, refusing to permit others to make judgments.” Bauman makes a very good point at the end of his last sentence in the article using “serves us and our offspring best” as a way to end the article. This opens minds and has you realizing that ‘offspring’ cannot be produced by a homosexual. They are incapable and therefore it could be considered unnatural stopping the natural breeding process, which leads into the next generation; creating the next generation.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the defensive of marriage act, signed in 1996, is holding many back from being able to marry what could be the significant other of their dreams.
- Opines that homosexuality is a choice, and that 'coming out' prevents or buffers against future mental health issues.
- Argues that the likelihood of therapy to overcome homosexuality is outdated, ineffective and harmful as such attempts have never shown to be successful.
- Analyzes how michael bauman's argument for same-sex marriage takes a different approach into the topic. he points out that the lbgs are hypocritical in advocating that value judgment about marriage is wrong.
982 wordsRead More - Persuasive Essay On Gay Marriageanalytical essayMarriage is the most powerful way for couples to show their love. However, it will be unfair for someone to try and negate the rights of married couples. Therefore, all types of marriages including gay marriages should be legalized since couples deserve equal rights and freedom. Opponents of gay marriage point out that it is against God’s laws, but they forget that the same Bible also promotes equality regardless of gender, race and religion. Moreover, if marriage is all about love, then those in love and committed to one another should be allowed to the freedom to marry regardless of their gender and age. Studies have revealed that heterosexual marriages are failing at a very at the very alarming rate. Based on this knowledge, gay marriages must, therefore, be legalized.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that gay marriages should be legalized since couples deserve equal rights and freedom. the bible promotes equality regardless of gender, race or religion.
- Explains that alaska and hawaii were the first states to legalize gay marriage in the year 1998.
- Explains that 70% of voters under the age of 30 support same-sex-marriage — they grew up in an environment that was gay-friendly and acknowledged that being gay was not a social evil. democrats fought for equal rights and the fact that the gay were human.
- Argues that gay marriage should be recognized in every way possible by the justice departments.
- Explains that the practice of gay marriage has impacted individuals, the society, and the state in several ways.
- Concludes that homosexuality is not a social evil and should be legalized to ensure the needs of all citizens are taken care of.
1219 wordsRead More