One of the major examples of when the directors did not follow the storyline is the ending. In the original ending of And Then There Were None, Vera Claythorne hanged herself and it was just that. She did it on her own will. In the movie, there is a pretty big difference. Vera comes back to the house after helping Lombard fake his death and see’s Justice Wargrave playing a game of pool. They have a talk about how he managed to pull off this scheme and how Vera is to be killed next. Wargrave wants Vera to hang herself and tries to convince her by saying that public hanging’s are gruesome but she does not comply most likely because Lombard still lives. He kills himself with a poisonous drink while Lombard comes in and his last words are, “Never …show more content…
I guess the major impact in this is that Lombard is still alive and that this is a good ending. I enjoy it because it’s a lot better than Vera just hanging herself. This is a completely different ending which is huge towards the story so once again, pretty big impact. Very good ending indeed. This change was most likely added because people would like it a lot better. Another example of a change that was included in the movie is how the movie plays out. Some of the parts are switched and different things happened before that were not in the novel. One would be the characters. Justice Wargrave had his name changed to something that I don’t remember and the guy who ran over the kids is now a prince who ran over two people instead. He still died the same way though and while we are on the topic of death, let’s speak of Mr. Rogers. In the book, he was exploring the attic when suddenly a bear clock falls on his head and kills him. In the film, this is quite different. He is outside with his binoculars. He sees something that catches his eye. He finally understands it all, but then he is crushed by a brick figure. I think the director put this in because it made more sense with where the story line was
Another thing that I noticed was that there crimes changed and some stayed the same. Vera didn’t try as hard as she could to try and save Cyril in the book and in the movie
When he goes looking for berries, he is confronted by a big bear. He had seen one before in a zoo, and thought that they would be something to stay away from in the wild. He thinks he is done for, and thinks he will be attacked. But the bear leaves him alone, leaving him with the thought that they only attack you if you attack them.
The movie and the story had some of the same characters but some weren't exactly the same. The movie introduced many different characters and changed some of the others. For example, the movie had the plant lady and had the mentor of Anderton as the founders of Precrime while in the book, Anderton was the only founder of Precrime. Also, Witwer wasn't blond he had black hair and Kapler wasn't named Kapler he was named Crow. In the story they had the red head Fleming who did not exist
There are usually differences in two different versions of something. This can often be seen when a book is made into a movie. There are many similarities and differences in the book and movie versions of To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee.
The most obvious changes are the physical elements of the film. People who are watching an edited movie before will realize that the backdrop is different before they realize that the music is different. Also, the balcony that the balcony scene took place in the 1968 version of the film
For example, Mama goes to the bank in the movie and is given a hard time about paying her mortgage, but this did not happen in the book. Another major difference is that the school bus scene, where the Logan kids played a trick on the white kids, was not shown in the movie, even though it was an important part of the story. There are some character changes as well. Lillian Jean, Jeremy, R.W, and Melvin are Simms’ in the book, but in the movie they are Kaleb Wallace’s children. However, the main plot difference is how the movie starts in the middle, summarizing everything from the first part of the book very briefly. Additionally, many scenes are switched around and placed out of order. Altogether, the plot and character changes contribute to my unfavorable impression of the
I have only included what I have to believe are largely important plot gaps and differences in the movie version in comparison to the book one, and so I apologize again if I have missed any other major ones. Forgive me, please.
In the movie productions of And Then There Were None and A Wrinkle in Time, the directors ventured away from the original story line. Sometimes, directors add events or take away original events to create more suspense or to build on the story line. Nevertheless, this is shown in both productions as they differ from their corresponding book. Foremostly, the director of the movie production of And Then There Were None ventured away from the original story line.
Usually movies try to take the story to a different level or by adding parts or just try to change it to a completely different story. Some of the differences between the movie as to the book are some little and large differences. They might also try taking little parts away that will change how the readers see the story characters. An example of that would be Walter not smoking in the movie (Pg 115). Walter usually smokes because he is stressed or just as a way to relax. Walter also does not get punched by Mam...
The books, A Wrinkle in Time and And Then There Were None, both have many differences in the movie versions. The directors of both movies change the plot to make the movie see fit to what they may have imaged the book to be, while still keeping the story line the same.
Many plot events were important to the story and stayed the same in the movie because of their importance , however in the movie
One of things that is admired by readers of this story is how the author seems to tell the story as if he's a storyteller, throwing out comments and little pieces of information out there so that his children may agree, disagree, understand, or even laugh. One last distinction to make note of is of how less descriptive the book is than the movie. First off, it would be best to note that there is no lack of descriptiveness in the book at all. The book is just not as descriptive as the movies, because the movies prefer to add some cinematic elements for detail, such as panoramic viewpoints and rotations around the scene, to let the viewer get a clearer view of the scene. Now that we're done contrasting, let's look at the comparisons between the
The plot in the film is very similar to the book but in parts, especially towards the end, the plot is slightly different to the film. The plot is varied in the film to show
... he starts to think more of how he may die. When he is finally pushed over the edge of the pit, which could be considered being pushed over the edge of insanity, everything comes rushing back to reality when he is grabbed by a General.
Of the many changes made between the book and the movie, most were made to keep the audience interested in the story. Most people who watch TV don’t have a long attention span. Executives at NBC didn’t want to spend millions to produce a movie and then have nobody watch it. The screenwriters had to throw in some clever plot twists to keep people interested. Another reason the movie was different from the book was the material in the book was a little too racy for network TV. Take the ending, for example, nobody wants to see a grown man hang himself. This was a reason the producers had to change some material in the movie.