Analysis Of The Harak

1551 Words4 Pages

Introduction

In the summer of 2015 Beirut was, literally, flooding with trash. It had been mounting since the contract between the government and Sukleen, a private company with exclusive rights for waste collection, had expired that July. Moreover, since 1997 garbage from Beirut and Mount Lebanon had been transported to Na’ameh, originally as a temporary measure. Since 2014, the residents of Na’ameh demanded for the closing of the dumpsite. As no progress had been made, in the summer of 2015 they blocked the access to the dumpsite, intensifying the crisis in Beirut (Nayel, 2015).

A group named YouStink emerged and called for a solution to the trash problem. Soon other actors joined with various demands, expanding the movement from dealing with the trash crisis to criticising the elite for failing the citizens. This social movement gained unprecedented popularity. In the Arabic media it received a name al-harak al-sha’by (The Popular Movement) (Kraidy, 2016: 21). Following Nayel and Moghnieh (2015), this essay thus uses the term Harak.

This essay offers a broad analysis of the Harak. First, …show more content…

Class divisions are very often neglected in analysis of Lebanon due to an overemphasis on sectarian divisions, but as Beinin and Duboc (2013) argue with the case of Egypt, class is an important explanatory category. While Abu-Rish’s analysis is very important in raising many crucial points, this essay moves forward from problematizing previous lenses, and offers an alternative one, the class lens. It will be shown that neo-liberalism of Lebanon benefitting the small corrupt upper class was an important context in creating the Harak. Moreover, the actions, and the networks that were created, all show that the classist discourse was eminent in the movement, and especially that there is a rift between the middle and working classes in

Open Document