Analysis Of Scar In The Lion King

1338 Words3 Pages

Scar from The Lion King is one of the most well-known villains to appear in a Disney movie. For many people who grew up in the nineties, Scar may have been one of the first antagonists they had seen in fiction. In the film, Scar murders his brother Mufasa and drives his nephew Simba away to assume control over the Pride Lands. By that description, it would be difficult to find any likable qualities in a character like Scar. However, nearly 400 years before the release of The Lion King, William Shakespeare wrote Hamlet. The antagonist of this play was King Claudius, Hamlet 's uncle. Claudius not only murdered his brother to take control of the throne, but he also marries his brother 's widowed wife. The writers of The Lion King took inspiration …show more content…

Claudius does not attempt to hurt Hamlet until he begins to “lose his sanity” and begins to catch on to his betrayal. Though this could be due to a number of reasons, one possibility is that even if Claudius views Hamlet as a potential threat, he still cares about him. Considering that he does not attempt to kill Hamlet until the end of the play, it is safe to assume that Claudius does not want to hurt Hamlet. In fact, Claudius does not even try to get rid of Hamlet at first! “For your intent In going back to school in Wittenberg, It is most retrograde to our desire. And we beseech you, bend you to remain here in the cheer and comfort of our eye, our chiefest courtier, cousin, and our son,” he says in Act I. Claudius not only wants Hamlet to stay, but he wants to treat Hamlet as his own son! Meanwhile, Scar 's main goal from the beginning was to get rid of both Mufasa and Simba so no one can challenge his power. This is an action that is extremely common for real lions to do. According to Live Science writer Douglas Main, “When male lions take over a new territory, they almost always kill the prides ' cubs, since they are not biologically related and do not want to spend energy ensuring that other lions ' genes will be passed on.” Scar 's goals depict what happens in real prides. It serves as a reminder that he is an animal as opposed to an identifiable character. Let 's not forget that this is …show more content…

After he gains power over the Pride Lands, he let the hyenas run amok. Combined with a drought, this lead to a famine. Despite the crisis, Scar took no responsibility and blamed everyone else. When confronted about the lack of food, Scar responds by stating, “No, you 're just not looking hard enough!” On top of that, he refuses to leave the Pride Lands to find more food for his subjects. Meanwhile, while Shakespeare does not show how he treats his subjects, Claudius ' leadership skills are stronger than Scar 's. Throughout the play, Claudius has to deal with the looming threat of war from Norway. Instead of just ignoring the obvious issue like Scar did, Claudius works to diffuse the situation the best he can. For example, Claudius reacts to being told that the prince of Norway plans on attacking his coutry by saying this: “Thus much the business is: we have here writ to Norway, uncle of young Fortinbras who, impotent and bedrid, scarcely hears of this his nephew’s purpose—to suppress his further gait herein, in that the levies, the lists, and full proportions are all made out of his subject; and we here dispatch you, good Cornelius, and you, Voltemand, for bearers of this greeting to old Norway, giving to you no further personal power to business with the king more than the scope of these dilated articles allow." Claudius does his best to keep his country out of war by sending a letter to the king of Norway to warn

Open Document