Analysis Of Mary Wollstonecraft's Vindication Of The Rights Of Women

1841 Words4 Pages

Political theorist Mary Wollstonecraft is viewed today as a key founding figure of feminism during the eighteenth century, specifically during the French Revolution and enlightenment period. The extent of Wollstonecraft’s radicalism, in advocating a society based on equality of the sexes has contributed greatly towards feminist political thought. Wollstonecraft’s thesis was a direct and sustained attack on Burke’s Reflections on the French Revolution and Jean Jacques Rousseau Émile, whereby they discuss the rights of man, viewing them as paramount to the rights of Women. Wollstonecraft’s Vindications, in Rights of Man is an open attack of Burke, whereas the Rights of Woman, proposes political reforms by discussing the importance of gaining legal, economic, and social rights for women. Wollstonecraft advocates a society based on equality of men and women, whereby women acquire knowledge and virtue, allowing …show more content…

Wollstonecraft’s Vindication of the Rights of Woman is focused upon middle- class women and neglects discussing the impact and the importance of gaining rights for working class women. In her critique of Wollstonecraft’s vindication, Brace (2002:435) argues that ‘Wollstonecraft risks confining women to the private sphere of the ‘natural’ family. She also fails to recognise, that the tensions between motherhood and citizenship affect middle- class women and working class women in different ways’. In choosing to base her reforms on middle-class women Wollstonecraft’s vindication, is insufficiently appreciated as her reforms do not necessarily promote equality for all women of different class positions, and by neglecting the discussion of working class women who are amongst the most marginalized, she contradicts her reform of living in an egalitarian society whereby men and women are

Open Document