Analysis Of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

1470 Words3 Pages

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein from 1818 and republished in 1994 by Dover Publications is an intense novel one can appreciate for its thorough and well-written analyses of the characters’ mental states. “You will rejoice to hear that no disaster has accompanied the commencement of an enterprise which you have regarded with such evil forebodings” (Shelley 1). Frankenstein’s first sentence grabs the reader’s attention and foreshadows the entirety of eerie events that occur in the book. The novel begins with Robert Walton writing a letter to his sister, describing his voyage across dangerous, frozen waters attempting to reach the North Pole with his ship and crew. One day, when the ship is surrounded by ice, Walton and his crew spot a large man-shaped …show more content…

Similar to any other book, there are instances where one begins to think “Is this page necessary?” and “What does this have to do with the plot?” while reading Frankenstein. Mary Shelley does an extraordinary job with writing about passionate guilt and hatred, but does poorly with developing certain aspects of the plot. The first fifty pages of the novel overfilled with character introductions and Victor Frankenstein’s backstory makes one exclaim “It took long enough!” by the time he or she reads about the first death of the novel. Shelley then spends three whole chapters describing the lives of the villagers the monster watches from a distance, rather than teaching about his experiences from doing so. This makes the reader desire to set the book down and fall asleep so that he or she may gain the energy to speed read through these chapters in order to continue reading about the psychological aspects of the monster. There are many pages of, “’As night came on, Agatha and the Arabian retired early. When they separated, Felix kissed the hand of the stranger and said, ‘Good night, sweet Safie’. He sat up much longer, conversing with his father…’” (83). Reading long passages of a family of villagers’ quiet lives becomes tiring, but is then redeemed by eventually reading a passage similar to this: “’Cursed, cursed creator! Why did I live? Why, in that …show more content…

The same applies to Victor Frankenstein as the story progresses. The reader first sympathizes with Victor as he explains how difficult his life became after creating a human that is the cause of the guilt that eats away at him. Shortly thereafter, one begins to feel irritated by Frankenstein’s personality and his attitude towards his creation. The first instance where one may question his or her opinion of Victor is when he describes his immediate regret of producing life. He states, “…breathless horror and disgust filled my heart. Unable to endure the aspect of the being I had created, I rushed out of the room…” (35). The reader’s initial response is “If he was going to regret creating a human, why did he not think this through completely?”. The second time is when his creation kills a child and frames another for the murder. Victor does nothing to help the child, such as explaining the truth of the matter, and lets her get executed for a murder she did not commit in order to keep himself from being shamed by the public for his previous doing. One then has to agree that Victor is not the sort of person a reader would want the main character to be. Finally, when the monster reaches out to Victor Frankenstein and asks to help him live a comfortable life, this is Victor’s response: “’Devil, cease; and do not poison the air with these sounds of malice. I have

Open Document