Content
The painting is called ‘Le déjeuner des canotiers’. It was crafted by French impressionistç who was born on 25 February 1841 and died 3 December 1919. As a boy, he worked in a porcelain factory where his drawing talents led to his being chosen to paint designs on fine china, This specific painting was produced in 1875 and was sold much later in 1923 for 125 thousand dollars. The painting is very artistic because it has still life and landscape all in one work which is rare for a usual artist, but that what makes him special. The painting is a group of Renoir's friends having a classy lunch at Maison Fournaise along the Seine river in Chatou, France. I feel his inspiration just came from the love of nature the love his friends and most
…show more content…
There could be a message actually because you could see men at the back with their fancy clothing and their hat and then you see the men who are closer wearing short sleeve white T-shirts this show us how there was that people that are poorer and people that are richer would eat at the same place but wont socialise …show more content…
Renoir's painting consists of many golden tones and the women's fair skin is reddened from the sun. He used oil paints to make this piece and it took him about six months to make after some effort he put into his detailing of each character and the perfection of each stroke in his work. This artist mainly focuses on painting and you can how he really tries to make every piece he produces the best. I think he had to have the skill of focusing, style decision making because these two are needed for an artist to succeed his work is very similar which makes and artist special when they have their own style. For example most people in the art world could immediately tell who a painting or art piece is done by like Van Gogh uses a specific style in his work which is deeply related to his feelings and that certain style is reflected through out his work which makes the artist significantly better and it is also shown in Renoir’s
The texture of the paint is smooth and flows very nicely the paintings composition is primarily bundled into the bottom right half of the image. The wings and legs of the animals as well as and table help form an invisible sloping line across the painting.
Caillebote’s “Paris Street; Rainy Day”. The painting was begun in 1876 and finished early in
When looking at the painting it gives us a glimpse of the past. It looks almost like a photograph. The fine detail from the building on the right with the statue on top. The citizens walking around.
What I see in this piece is peacefulness. Stokes of the paintbrush are perfect to make it look whole. With the sun shinning down making the colors pop out even more. The olive trees glowing in the suns light with the mountains behind it. It is a piece I could look at for a long time with out getting bored. The colors of the piece just make it look so complete. With the lines of the
The mixed reaction I have towards the painting is because, first off, I still wouldn’t know what is really behind it or what it’s trying to tell us without looking at it from a distance. When I looked at it from a computer desktop I could see a shoe, a mountai...
The texture of the canvas works very well with the subject matter portrayed in the painting. The grassy hill side and the leaves of the trees are especially complimented by the canvas. It makes the leaves feel like they are slightly moving, this combined with the lack of detail itself the leaves. This is contrasted nicely with the very detailed renderings of the trunks and branches of the trees, the conscious decision to put so much effort into the tree itself and then to use obvious brushwork in the leaves makes the trees much more firm and immovable in the landscape. The brushstrokes are very clean and precise on the trees in the background.
The first thing to notice about this painting is how incredibly involved and realistic the brushwork is. The couple’s faces are so delicately rendered. Every wrinkle is visible and every hair strand is in it’s place. The soft folds and patterns of their clothing, and the grain of the vertical boards on the house, are highly developed and reveal Wood’s incredible attention to detail. The man, especially, appears to be nearly photorealistic.
This piece is acrylic, oilstick, and spray paint on wood panel that is 186.1 centimeters in height and 125.1 centimeters in width. This piece features a human-like figure in the center that is mostly half red and half black. This figure has a gray head with one yellow eye and one light gray eye and above its head is a black halo. The background consists of patches of various colors such as light blue, black, dark red, light green, beige, turquoise, pink, and yellow. On the bottle left corner there is a figure drawn that looks like a fish and has a strip of mustard yellow painted through it. Also towards the bottom right of the artwork, there is some drawn on letters that almost look like words but are messily painted over with a desert sand color. This piece is my favorite because I find it aesthetically pleasing. There is a lot going on in this piece that makes looking at it genuinely interesting. The colors that Basquiat choses for the background go very well together and overall compliment the figure in the center. I like how incredibly expressive this piece is and it makes me want to buy a canvas and start painting that I desire. I also like how the human-like figure is drawn. One could see what looks like an outlined ribcage on the figure, which makes me believe that the head is actually a skull. Upon further research I learned that Basquiat was
The painting is organized simply. The background of the painting is painted in an Impressionist style. The blurring of edges, however, starkly contrasts with the sharp and hard contours of the figure in the foreground. The female figure is very sharp and clear compared to the background. The background paint is thick compared to the thin lines used to paint the figures in the foreground. The thick paint adds to the reduction of detail for the background. The colors used to paint the foreground figures are vibrant, as opposed to the whitened colors of the Impressionist background. The painting is mostly comprised of cool colors but there is a range of dark and light colors. The light colors are predominantly in the background and the darker colors are in the foreground. The vivid color of the robe contrasts with the muted colors of the background, resulting in an emphasis of the robe color. This emphasis leads the viewer's gaze to the focal part of the painting: the figures in the foreground. The female and baby in the foreground take up most of the canvas. The background was not painted as the artist saw it, but rather the impression t...
Edgar Degas was a French artist famous for his work in painting human figure in their motion. He was often known as an Impressionist, although he rejected being called that preferred to be called a realist. In each of his paintings he would express the harmony of line and stability of outline. One of his paintings is The Absinthe Drinker in 1876 as it is an oil on canvas. There are many impressionist painting techniques, though one technique Degas use is a snapshot. A snapshot is a painting that looks like a photograph of a scene. At first sight the impression of the portrait portrays an aspect of modernity. There are two individuals sitting side by side inside a cafe de la Nouvelle-Athenes in Paris, while there is no communicating between them. As it looks like each one is melancholic in their own isolation. Th...
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
... be the woman 's fitted blue dress with a lace trim around the collars and pleads laying vertically down the front. The three sewing pins in the shoulder and the rolled up sleeves also add to the dress. On the table I have already mentioned the spoon, but the details in the fruit as well leave an impression of realism. The way the apples shine, the shading on the peaches, the crumbs left on the table, and the rings in the onion slices all appear to be real enough you can reach out a grab them. The cloth Spencer painted draping half on half off the table showing the stitches in the fabric represent an exquisite component to the still life.
In addition, to the composition of the painting, the balance is also a dynamic factor. Both Ducci...
The composition concentrates mainly on the foreground .It has three main points of interest, the small rowing boats, the artificial island and the floating barge .It also has a stretch of trees and foliage in the background painted in a much lighter fashion. Monet?s painting has a very different composition from Renoir?s painting of Grenouillere, which was done at the same time; Renoir?s painting is focussed much more on the artificial island and the people on it. Monet uses a combination of thick bold brushstrokes and small short soft brushstrokes; this creates a nice varied look and helps give a good impression of perspective. The tone is also very varied as it is Very light in some areas, but it is also quite dark in others, such as the shades on the barge. The use of dark shades in the foreground makes the boat look so realistic and quite 3D. Although the middle ground is flatter this helps add to the perspective. The water ho...
To me the painting is a way of showing you what everyone else is seeing. That the painter had the men looking right at each other so they can see themselves running away. In turn I got to see myself doing the same thing and was able to change because of it. When other people look at the painting they probably see something else. That is why I choose to do the painting, it gives you the choice too interpret it any way you see fit. Or it can just be a beautiful painting to look at, but the painting was so much more to me. It painted a thousand words for me.