Analysis Of Karen Armstrong's Essay 'Homo Religiosus'

1844 Words4 Pages

People who are dominated play a role in cultural dominance, but how is cultural dominance possible? Cultural dominance is control and power enforced by a country or group over individuals. In Karen Armstrong’s essay “Homo Religiosus” she talks about how the relationship between myth, art, and religion has changed over time. In Ethan Watters’ essay “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan” he talks about how pharmaceutical companies in the west are trying to change the meaning of depression and market it to the Japanese people, for the benefits of themselves, rather than the Japanese people. In Karen Ho’s essay “Biographies of Hegemony” she addresses the issue of Wall Street recruitment on college campuses, as well as Ivy League students …show more content…

These entities are the ones who influence and control how the people that are below them think and act. Moreover, Armstrong says, “Religion was not something tacked on to the human condition, an optional extra imposed on people by unscrupulous priests” (Armstrong 6). Armstrong implies that the priest’s force their views on people and the people who follow the priest’s in other words agree and support what the priest say. Therefore, the priest’s are controlling a whole religion by just the way they act and or talk, especially when the economic interests are in their favor. In addition, Ho exclaims, “It is important to pause here to acknowledge that many of these students are of course quite aware of how the culture of smartness, as coproduced by elite universities, students, and Wall Street, capitalizes on, monopolizes, and narrows students’ interests” (Ho 181). Ho implies by saying “capitalizes” and “monopolizes” that Wall Street is profiting from the students and they are seen as money. The bankers try to persuade and entice these students so they follow them and take the job with that bankers company. In the first case from Armstrong, most of the people involved are not aware of the dominance the priest’s are exerting, but in the second case, in Ho’s essay, the students are more aware of the dominance being exerted, rather they just fall into the trap of the investment bankers. Ultimately, two different situations, the leaders of the particular group are gaining followers in order to make a profit, and or persuade those individuals’ decisions by telling them what they want to here. These situations are comparable to how a dictator runs a country; as the leader the dictator keeps their economic interest in mind in order to persuade and win over the votes and or the support of the citizens. Needless to say, a person of high power uses

Open Document