Differences Of Friendship In Emily Brontë's Wuthering Heights

1002 Words3 Pages

Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights shares several notable similarities and differences with both Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and Montaigne’s Of Friendship. After reading extended excerpts from Ethics and Of Friendship, it became rather clear that Brontë obviously borrowed from the philosophers several themes and ideals about the dynamics of relationships and love. Wuthering Heights effectively demonstrates how most relationship forms, through an interconnected web of entangled lives, work to reveal people in their basest forms. Though the works are separated by hundreds, if not thousands of years, the age-old trials of love, friendship, passion, and revenge link Wuthering Heights with the foundational treatises. More specifically, Brontë 's …show more content…

Montaigne mentions this in Of Friendship when he discusses the difference between romantic and platonic love. His assertion, to the effect of, once romantic love enters into the arena of friendship, the quality of love grows weakened and doesn’t stand up to the scrutiny of time. The pleasures of physical love grow tedious and tiresome, thus diminishing the relationships importance. However, platonic friendship is strengthened and enhanced by time, enjoyment, and personal engagement with the intimate act of friendship appears to be play-by-play of the turbulent relationship between Heathcliff and Catherine (60). Brontë’s approach to Heathcliff and Catherine’s relationship mirrors the love, adoration, and mutual love of what Montaigne called a “perfect friendship,” but as the two allowed romantic love to intrude into the realm of platonic love friendship their relationship turned sour and dangerous, being founded on misplaced obsession, rather than real, soul connecting …show more content…

It is no longer an innocent love, but a consuming need to be together, regardless of the social implications. Their early friendship, before the messiness of romantic love enters the equation, seems to be Montaigne 's exemplary "…perfect friendship…[which] is indivisible: each one gives himself so wholly to his friend that he has nothing left to distribute" (67). However, in their treatment of one another, it remains throughout the novel that the relationship dynamics are unequal. Catherine is very wishy-washy and selfish in her feelings and attitude toward Heathcliff, and the hot and cold leaves him confused, frustrated, and unwilling to move on. The inequity that reigns over their relationship can be viewed as a relationship of utility, which as Aristotle says, "those who love for the sake of utility love for the sake of what is good for themselves…thus, these friendships are only incidental…Such friendships, then, are easily dissolved, if the parties do not remain like themselves; for if the one party is no longer pleasant or useful the other ceases to love him” (129). The “perfect relationship” that Brontë seems to be after is nothing more than a façade. She borrows concepts and themes from both Aristotle and Montaigne but fails to implement

Open Document