Analysis Of Artificial Intelligence

954 Words2 Pages

Artificial intelligence, a figment of our imaginations in the past, but a reality of our futures. As a kid, movies like Smart House and i, robot were just cool ideas that I never could have imagined would be real someday. Artificial intelligence has made false realities of the past, real. Joi Ito, Neil Harbisson, and the movie i, robot all discuss different views from which we can understand artificial intelligence. Through the views of Ito, Harbisson, and i, robot we can analyze how artificial intelligence has and will change the future within the ideas and conclusions these authors have come to. In the movie i, robot there are three laws all robots are programmed to follow: 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow …show more content…

Harbisson has personally experienced the greatness of technology through his antennae. Harbisson, unlike Detective Spooner and Ito is ready to go headfirst into artificial intelligence, although he does recognize that robots alone wont benefit society enough. His solution to this problem is different from Spooner and Ito, Harbisson believes we should become the robots instead. Although Harbisson’s ideas seem rash and outrageous, they might not be too far from the future. Harbisson himself, as well as Detective Spooner both have artificial enhancements in their bodies. Harbisson with an antenna implanted in his skull that allows him to extend his perception of color beyond the visual spectrum, and Spooner with his prosthetic arm covered by his own skin, as though it is a human arm. Harbisson claims that “Our current evolutionary step is to merge with technology and take an active part in the birth of our future selves.” (Harbisson, 2016) His argument relies on societal preference of the future, Harbisson states that “If we don’t want technology to become more intelligent than humans, then humans need to become technology.” (Harbisson, 2016) Therefore giving humans the advantage. What Harbisson is trying to convey is that technology and A.I. will consume our world regardless, so we might as well become artificial intelligence instead of allowing robots to take us over. Factors such as human emotion, and the ability to make art are unaccounted for in Harbisson’s plans. I don’t necessarily believe that Harbisson has accounted for a lot of other things, he needs to better analyze his perspectives. Using i, robot as a resource of knowledge to argue against Harbisson, we see that robots, even as humans, can never truly intertwine successfully, at least not

Open Document