Analysis Of 1831: A Year Of Eclipse

1380 Words3 Pages

There are pinnacle years in American history that are raised above others because of the events that occurred in the midst of that year. Very familiar years such as 1492, 1607, 1776, and 1861 yield memories of significant occurrences that citizens have been taught their entire lives. However, after reading 1831: A Year of Eclipse, I have realized that the year 1831 was a monumental year for America as a country and was the tipping point for what the country would look like in the future. Louis Masur is trying to portray the importance of the year 1831 and have the audience understand that without the events that happened in that year, the United States would not look the same. In 1831, there was a notable shift in the thought process and the way Americans accomplished tasks and Masur is trying to allude to this change and deem it as important in the minds of his audience. The first phenomena that Masur alludes to is the slavery and abolitionist crisis. He starts off the chapter by explaining who Nat Turner is and the posture in which slavery is in. Masur paints the mindset of the slave owners by saying, “the slaves were content…slavery was a righteous institution…[we] were good masters. (pg 10).” Up until this point in history, no one had ever really challenged slavery. Slavery was real …show more content…

(pg 64). In the past, there had been puritan and separatist movements that were about being a light to the world, and Great Awakenings pertaining to moral reformation. However, this movement was based on the question, “what must I do to be saved? (pg 63).” With that being said, the real change in thinking comes in the answer to that question. Before this movement, a lot of what it meant to be saved was actions based, however, Finney’s movement was about inviting God into your life and listening to the Spirit of God to direct

Open Document