Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Volkswagen scandal case study
Volkswagen scandal case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Volkswagen scandal case study
Is honesty for suckers? The cheating Scandal at Volkswagen sparked many debates and wide spread complaints on the acts itself, and how these acts are/were handled by the justice system. Among most of these complaints, one topic that was common was that most of frauds/cheatings having major effects are getting more and more frequent and are somehow getting by with almost no major moral consequences. There were also some rather interesting take on honesty that were presentenced on some of the article. On one of the article was the discussions about the act of dishonesty itself, and how the losses due to the cheating of the emission test stood up to losses incurred by other related problems. The writer also included the financial burden the cheating …show more content…
There is no such thing as being “more honest” or being “less honest”. There exists only two categories: honesty and dishonesty, and there are no other categories of honesty based on the effects it has. Furthermore, the effect itself cannot judged by someone outside the pool of the affected people. For example, of two corrupt employees of different companies facing trial for corruption, both had stolen money form the customers of the company. While one had overcharged $2000 to one very rich client, the other overcharged $10 to a 100 middle class clients. What is the measure of dishonesty here? Who is “more dishonest?” While one’s dishonesty had the greater figure, other’s on the other hand affected more people. How can we judge the severity of the effects? Furthermore, how can we judge the impact of losing money on the victims? It could be the rest of their savings or their throw away money. We cannot judge the importance of the money by comparing it with something completely irrelevant like, the price of .7 grams of gold or the cost of the advertisement of a small company. No one can be certain of the range of impact the effects of dishonesty has, except the victim. So, it is almost absurd to quantify honesty taking its effects into
William Damon uses the classical rhetorical devices of logos, pathos and ethos to convince his audience of the urgency to address the decline of honesty. He provides a balanced assessment of the need for discretion in specific circumstance, the expectation of lying that leads to the decline in honesty, and the outright accommodation to cheat without consequence. By alluding to historical attitudes regarding honesty, Damon provides a vast background to support his thesis. His essay successfully evokes a response to this current situation of decline in honesty, and creates an urgent call for action to restore the virtue of honesty. As a society, the audience would likely agree with Damon that the virtue of honesty is fundamental to the success of democracy and we would desire to espouse to the protection of this jeopardized virtue.
In The Liars ' Club, Mary Karr recounts her dysfunctional childhood and the various struggles she and her family endured. Although both of Mary’s parents were suffered from severe alcoholism, Mary’s mother was also incredibly abusive as a result of mental illness. Growing up, Mary frequently witnessed violent episodes, fits and delusions that eventually landed her mother in a mental institution. Inevitably intensified by the alcoholism, her parents fought all the time, resulting in physical violence and constant threats of divorce. In just a few of her mother’s episodes, she tried to drive their car off of a bridge, starts fires and almost stabs her children with
“So if sumo wrestlers, schoolteachers, and day-care parents all cheat, are we to assume that mankind is innately and universally corrupt? And if so, how corrupt?” (Levitt and Dubner 43). In my opinion this rhetorical question summarizes Chapter 1’s findings and poses two different sides of an argument. The author finds that cheating is more common when an individual is placed into a win or lose situation. The incentive to cheat is the concept that an individual is getting more for less. So, similarly to how teachers may change their students’ test scores to get a higher pay or praise, sumo-wrestlers might rig matches to obtain a higher ranking. To analyze how incentives cause teachers and sumo wrestlers
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
“For every clever person who goes to the trouble of creating an incentive scheme, there is an army of people, clever and otherwise, who will inevitably spend even more time trying to beat it. Cheating may or may not be human nature, but it is certainly a prominent feature in just about every human endeavor. Cheating is a primordial economic act: getting more or less” (21). This quote is important because it proves how everyone has cheated once. In many cases it is true, people often cheat on tests or even on their diet. Not everyone can live up to their expectations. Some may justify it, others proudly proclaim it, and others will try denying their cheating vigorously. Most people consider cheating as a bad and unwise action. In this novel, it gave two examples of cheaters, school teachers and sumo wrestlers. It shows how both authors can take two different people and still find something similar with both of them, like cheating.
In the two readings, “ The insufficiency of honesty” author Stephan L. Carter and “What isn’t for sale?” by Michael J Sandle, These writings address the two issues in society. One being honesty and the other is giving up morals in order to obtain something. Both of these authors say society is giving up their morals in order to acquire what they want. Society will do anything and forget about honesty and morals. Markets are putting monetary value to items that shouldn’t have monetary value. People give up their morals in order to have these items.
In Stephen L Carter's "The Insufficiency of Honesty", he attempts to dissect exactly what it means to be honest and to have integrity in the worlds view. We soon realize as a reader that it takes a greater deal of effort to participate in
The Journal of Personality and Social Psychology article The Cheater’s High: The Unexpected Affective Benefits of Unethical Behavior challenges this consensus and demonstrates that unethical behavior stimulates positive affect, termed “cheater’s high.” Cheating is associated with self-satisfaction, and the “high” one receives from cheating only increases with self-deception about the unethical behavior. Study 1 gauged affective predictions following unethical behavior. In Study 1a, participants were asked to predict whether they’d predict to feel positive effects after cheating on a hypothetical test that would earn them more money the more they answer correctly. Participants generally responded negative, implying that there is no predicted “cheater’s
His results were very revealing and demonstrated several variables which promoted either higher or lower levels of cheating. The study found that if someone from the “in” crowd blatantly cheated and didn’t receive any repercussions, then the majority would follow suit with cheating. However, he found that if the individual cheating in front of everyone was an unknown person or belonged to a different group, the controlled group wouldn’t follow with cheating. Mr. Ariely reveled that humans are more apt to bend the moral code when others are already doing so unless the one pioneering the cheating is a paid actor in but not apart of the controlled group. In summery, when someone takes the first step and cheats in a group, it creates an atmosphere where it is acceptable and natural to cheat. In contrast, when a stranger among the group cheats, although, there is an increase in awareness of the cheating, there is less
One man’s ultimate demise is caused by his use of deception for the happiness of others. In Cyrano de Bergerac by Edmond Rostand, Cyrano loves Roxane, but is too afraid to tell her of his love due to his looks. He eventually resorts to helping Christian love Roxane by writing his words for him, leading to the two getting married. However, Roxane swears that she will never love another man and lives in a convent after Christian’s death in battle, leaving Cyrano without love for fifteen years, until just before his death. Cyrano’s insecurities about his appearance prevent him from being honest, proving that his use of deception leads to his downfall, misery and death.
Through out history people have been influenced by what they want to hear and the way a current trend is happening. The evolution of mankind has drifted towards a different society than what we where born to sustain. We are emotionally driven human beings that want to feel accepted by the rules of society. Sometimes an individual can confuse actions or emotions towards trying to fulfill the standards society has imposed. I have analyzed two articles that incorporate how a society reacts towards integrity as well as honesty and the belief that an individual in order to be a part of society one must comply with the standards that are set. As I began to interpret what Stephen L. Carter explained in “The Insufficiency of Honesty” I examined they
I discovered how sticking to one’s morals should be the topmost priority for everyone involved in business, whether personal or professional. Regardless of what the consequences may be, the intensity of the problem, and the complexities it may bring, sacrificing one’s integrity should never be an option, as integrity goes hand-in-hand with the morals of an individual (Duggan & Woodhouse, 2011). They further go on to say that having individuals take part in building a code of ethics that supports employee integrity, they will act ethically. Also, I believe that companies should place more emphasis on the moral behavior of their employees, and clear-cut policies should be set regarding such ethical situations. Furthermore, I realized how serving justice while making decisions really helps in the long run, and that opting to go for the ideal rather than they deserved is not always the best option, and could hurt a company in more than one
Works Cited "Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam" Argumentum Ad Ignorantiam - "Ad. Lander, a.k.a. The X-Men. Web. The Web.
The Hollate Manufacturing case provided by Anti-Fraud Collaboration has well illustrated how several common issues in an organization contributed to the fraud’s occurrence. These issues can be categorized into two major groups: ethical culture (internal aspect) and internal control system (external aspect). By taking effective actions to enhance these two aspects, an organization can protect itself against the largest frauds, which result in financial and reputational damage.
"Fools make researches and wise men exploit them." Merriam-Webster's dictionary defines the word plagiarize as to pass off as one's own the ideas or words of another. Every student knows that plagiarism is dishonest and wrong. Why do so many students do it? Students themselves may not believe that they are plagiarizing. Many students plagiarize because of the diverse types of plagiarism which are often unknown to students. The three major types of plagiarism are shameless, haphazard and self-plagiarism. Self-plagiarism is a relatively new concept that has not gained much attention in the student world.