The American Red Cross has had a major impact on the lives of millions of people who have faced disastrous circumstances. Furthermore, this organization is considered as an elite charitable organization by a large number of American citizens due to its many years of heroic service to thousands of U. S. communities and during war times. Additionally, the organization is funded through many campaigns for charitable donations which gives millions of American citizens the belief that he or she is part of all this organization’s humanitarian efforts. But, greed has a way of affecting the ethical behavior of some people even though his or her intentions started out as noble.
Today, the American Red Cross provides relief to millions of
Because many people consider philanthropy to be a completely voluntary or discretionary aspect of corporate social responsibility, failure to be philanthropic is generally not considered as unethical; some may question whether it is a corporate ‘‘responsibility’’ at all. (Brian K. 2005) The caring approach seems much more realistic to use in terms of how people in business actually make decisions, as well as how they should make decisions. Managerial experience and observation of managers leads to conclude that morally and economically effective managers consider possible effects on other individuals, not amorphous groups, unless those groups are very homogeneous in nature. These managers think about themselves as well as others. When faced with conflicts they try to find the actions that fit the particular situation the best, intuitively understanding that each situation is different and deserves full consideration itself, and not some
The NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct was developed to uphold the application of core values, ideals, and principles to assist teachers’ decision-making about ethical issues. The Core Values of the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct is based on the foundation of the field's commitment to young children. It is noteworthy that all seven of the Code's Core Values directly address our commitment to children:
“Most people in the U.S. want to do the right thing, and they want others to do the right thing. Thus, reputation and trust are important to pretty much everyone individuals and organizations. However, individuals do have different values, attributes, and priorities that guide their decisions and behavior. Taken to an extreme, almost any personal value, attribute, or priority can “cause” an ethical breach (e.g. risk taking, love of money or sta...
The word ‘philanthropic’ is such a broad term. It cannot be defined in simple terms because it is a complicated interrelationship of many components. Those components include hope, humanity, compassion, faith, and an intense truth, especially of the human spirit. It can be said that philanthropy is a methodical plan of sincere intentions on making the world a better place for the better good.
Morality can be separated into many entities, one of which being one’s willingness to personally sacrifice for someone else. One’s own mind may factor into one’s decision when put in a difficult situation, a situation as extreme as putting your own well-being on the line for someone else’s. Many people, when asked if they would help others at nearly any cost, would automatically answer yes; however, when faced with this type of hardship, one, more often than not, does what is in their self-interest. That, however, does not define whether one should help others or not. One is morally obligated to sacrifice their well-being for the benefit of another’s.
How much money is one morally obligated to give to relief overseas? Many In people would say that although it is a good thing to do, one is not obligated to give anything. Other people would say that if a person has more than he needs, then he should donate a portion of what he has. Peter Singer, however, proposes a radically different view. His essay, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” focuses on the Bengal crisis in 1971 and claims that one is morally obligated to give as much as possible. His thesis supports the idea that “We ought to give until we reach the level of marginal utility – that is, the level at which, by giving more, I would cause as much suffering to myself or my dependents as I would relieve by my gift” (399). He says that one's obligation to give to people in need half-way around the world is just as strong as the obligation to give to one's neighbor in need. Even more than that, he says that one should keep giving until, by giving more, you would be in a worse position than the people one means to help. Singer's claim is so different than people's typical idea of morality that is it is easy to quickly dismiss it as being absurd. Saying that one should provide monetary relief to the point that you are in as bad a position as those receiving your aid seems to go against common sense. However, when the evidence he presents is considered, it is impossible not to wonder if he might be right.
In the world of non-profit organizations the fiscal year and its financial stability are just as important as its mission. One cannot exist without the other. An organization needs a mission, a set of values, and a vision the entire organization and its employees can unite behind. In large organization the leaders must determine the organization’s ethics and leadership structure to model and guide others in maintaining ethical practices.
By definition, altruism is "the principle or practice of unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others". Through vigorous analysis, however, I have established it to be a complex ideology whose followers can be divided into three categories: slaves, abusers, and advocates. The slave abides by the ideals of 'pure' altruism. In other words, he does not act according to personal need or desire; humanity is all that matters. This is altruism in its purest form and is the branch of altruism which envelopes Catherine and allows her to feel a sense of purpose. Yet, much more common is the abuser of altruism. He is the altruist who ascertains and seizes any opportunity for personal gain by abusing the ostensibly philanthropic ideology. As ironic as this seems, it is common practice for one to proffer with the intention of receiving something in return. Peter Keating demonstrates how such an abuser manipulates altruism into a golden ladder by which he may reach success. Reigning over even the most conniving abuser is the omnipot...
Which of the six principles in the AICPA Code of Conduct is most related to Article 1.5 of the California Accountancy Act? Explain your conclusion.
It is important to know how the Red Cross began. It was in June 1859 when Henry Dunant went to Solferino, north of Italy. He was a spectator of a small but bloody war. French and Italians had a battle against Austrians. There were more or less 40,000 victims. He was completely horrified with the scene. He interrupted his trip to help the hurt and organized volunteers to save lives.
The American Red Cross is an organization that assists government agencies in the event of a natural disaster. The organization is largely made up of volunteers as well as paid employees and the board of directors. The board chairman is appointed by the President of the United States. The board appoints a president and CEO to manage the business of the Red Cross. The Red Cross has experienced turbulent times with their CEO’s which has resulted in a high turnover rate as well as public scandals. A highly controversial fact is that when CEO's were forced to resign they were given large severance packages for which they received great criticism (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2014).
People perpetrate seemingly selfless acts almost daily. You see it all over the news; the man who saved that woman from a burning building, the mother who sacrificed herself to protect her children from the bomb blast. But how benevolent are these actions? Are these so-called “heroes” really sacrificing themselves to help others? Until recently, it was the common belief that altruism, or selfless and unconditional kindness, was limited primarily to the human race. However, within the last century, the works of several scientists, most prominently George Price, have provided substantial evidence concluding that altruism is nothing more than a survival technique, one that can be calculated with a simple equation.
Whenever one finds themselves involved in the age-old debate of whether citizens of the United States are greedy or generous, their arguments are usually fueled by opinion rather than fact. The fact of the matter is, that citizens of the United States are generally magnanimous people. In fact, as an American citizen I believe that my fellow citizens are quite charitable, generous, and pragmatic. The evidence to support this claim includes the following facts: that American citizens rank first in the world in charity, that most Americans are generous because of their religious upbringings, and that Americans find that generosity isn’t just beneficial for society but for the giving individual as well.
The world we live in today is facing a numerous amount of issues; from environmental, to economic, to social and political complexities and instabilities. The capitalist market has adopted an “aggressive” growth strategy, and businesses have as a primary goal generating the maximum amount of profit possible, leaving no room for collectivistic efforts. Along with these problems ethical responsibility is another issue businesses and individuals have to face.
In fact, in my own experience, I notice that the government of my country fail to provide adequate needs to homeless people because they saw that an issue of the individual and from charities organizations. Though the work of charities organizations is admirable, having these non- profit organizations take care of social and political issues however can be problematic, since often these charities societies have biases toward people in need which can prevent them from extending their help for all people suffering from social issues. For example, because the organization that my mother work was religiously founded, they only focused their help to homeless children suffering from mental illness and not all people suffering from the same conditions. Thus, like most government assistance, profit organizations can also make a distinction when offering their help to worthy and unworthy individuals. Also, because these organizations are fueled by an American belief on self- achievement, they tend to emphasize the individual role in poverty and see poverty rather as a character and not a social defect. Thus, as a result, charity organizations can advocate for individual relief and change to stop poverty. Finally, charities organizations can also cause major issues in the way that countries assessed and measure poverty. For example, it can give the impression that the individual is at fault for their own living conditions and second, it can cause major devolution of federal and governmental social programs. In other words, the presence of charities and other societies can cause the government to indirectly decrease its political participation in social issues by turning this a responsibility of local communities and entities. This in turn can affect the variation and diversity of social programs in the US, while reflecting the current predominant view