American Immigration Dbq

1532 Words4 Pages
narchy was on the rise in the United States and was viewed as a threat to American ideals. During this time, America was already fearful of increased threats against democracy due to World War One and the flux in European immigration. Both the anti-immigration and anti-anarchist mindset had been developing, and made the case of Sacco and Vanzetti that much more complex. Both men were foreign born Italian immigrants and well-known followers of the anarchist group Galleanist. During the trial, there were major concerns that began to arouse—such as the bias from jurors towards the trial regarding the men’s national origin. The decision to execute the two men was unjust and heavily influenced by the biased views of the jurors and the judge himself.…show more content…
This was happening due to either the quantity or quality of immigrants, or the market conditions America was facing during that time. Unemployment and labor unrest were becoming concerns as a major recession came with the ending of World War I. Returning soldiers would want their jobs back but wouldn’t be hired due to the low wages the factory owners were able to pay the immigrant workers; also, immigrant workers were more easily substitutable as they were more often lesser-skilled compared to American “native-born” who tended to be higher skilled workers. Historically, the U.S. had seen this happen before and therefore was aware of the economic impact the immigrants had no matter where they lived or worked. To make it more complicated, the ethnic composition of the immigrants became a clear factor in the making of these restrictions; per example, the U.S. had banned all immigrants from China in 1882. But in the 1900s the demand of restrictions was set for what American considered the “new immigrant” , people which hailed from southern, central, and eastern Europe. The policies were said to have been measuring the “quality of immigrant” to ensure America was not becoming more unstable, but there still seemed to…show more content…
For clarity, anarchism is a political theory in which the followers are skeptical of the justification authority of political power. Usually, anarchism is focused in moral claims of the importance of individual liberty. It offers a positive theory about human flourishing by basing it on an ideal of non-coercive consensus building. The idea of establishing utopian communities, radical and revolutionary political agendas, was inspired by the ideals that anarchism believed in. Political anarchists focus their critique on the state of power. They view centralized, monopolistic power as illegitimate, thus they criticize the state for it: “…states are criminal organizations. All states, not just the obviously totalitarian or repressive ones” . To the people who followed these ideals it was some form of antidote; whilst to others surrounding it, anarchism was an illness and an intimate threat against society and everything vital to it. Because the majority of Americans saw this as a threat, the government officials wrote laws which resulted in many legal battels and clashes with American anarchists over the right to freedom of expression. Inspired by utopian fiction, anarchists relentlessly debated their desires with communal societies. On top of this, anarchism was seeming to spread

More about American Immigration Dbq

Open Document