Alice Munro Hypocriticism

1113 Words3 Pages

Alice Munro subtle use of contrasting word combinations in “Miles City, Montana” foreshadows the narrator’s realization that human hypocrisy is natural and consistently present in her life. The word combinations Munro uses are atypical, often using words that subtly disconnect (almost oxymoronic). These word combinations allow Munro to saturate the story with what could be called “hypocritical phrases”. These phrases are not aggressive, and by virtue of this trait, they can be uses to form an idea of hypocrisy’s role in nature and daily life without being colored by the usually negative connotations of the word .In “Miles City, Montana”, Alice Munro uses atypical, contrasting or hypocritical word combinations to permeate the theme of hypocrisy …show more content…

Munro uses central idea of hypocrisy again, but this time looking specifically at the role of hypocrisy in the universe. “[B]y rights they[children] should have sprung up free, to live a new, superior kind of life, not to be caught in the snares of vanquished grownups, with their sex and funerals” (579). Munro’s prose reaches a peak of contrast with the combination of “sex and funerals”. Though the former nestles within intense passion and love which can eventually lead to the creation of life, the latter encapsulates the grief of mourning that same life. Munro’s use of the word vanquished to describe adults reveals the narrator’s true disenchantment with the illusion of control parents seem to represent. Though adults can try to prevent the death of their children, they cannot, in fact, do so due to the unpredictable nature of the tragedy. Any adult failing or trying to protect their child is therefore “vanquished” before tragedy can even strike. Though Munro could have stopped using words to represent duplicity with “sex and funerals” or “vanquished”, she continues driving the point of hypocrisy throughout the quote. In the passage, the parents’ “snares” imply deception; rather than saying that the children are encaged, Munro’s “snares” shows that the children are tricked into becoming trapped by their parents’ façade of power. No matter where one turns within the story, Munro ensures that …show more content…

As a child, while grappling with her newfound realization of a parent’s inherent understanding of their child’s morality, Munro’s narrator claims that “the others [gave consent to Steve’s death], saying the Lord’s Prayer in their unnaturally weighted voices, oozing religion and dishonor”(580) . Though these people “ooze religion”, often considered a moral or good description, they are branded as hypocrites precisely for their prayers. This may be the pious adults are quick to blame the tragedy on Mr. Gauley’s parenting. This blame game becomes a source of tension for the narrator: if the other adults could see how Mr. Gauley’s parenting would cause Steve’s death, why did they not prevent it? Even if these people are considered “good”, the idea that they refuse to admit they do not control the circumstances surrounding Steve’s death seems irreconcilable with the fact that they pray (i.e. hypocritical). In prayer, they admit their lack of power in the world by asking for help from another being. Their dishonor and consent comes from the fact that they are able to somehow pinpoint a reason to censure his father and in doing so act like they could have controlled the circumstances surrounding Steve’s death, yet never correct the behavior they indict as responsible for this death. By accusing those

Open Document