Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the great impact essay paper
Alexander the great research papers
Alexander the great impact essay paper
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Alexander the great impact essay paper
Very few reliable sources on Alexander the Great’s reign remain in existence today. Of these sources, the four major ones are histories by Plutarch, Diodorus, Arrian and Quintus Rufus. The earliest of these sources was written in the first century BC, so it is clear to see that the author’s own personal outlook may have influenced by their times and personal experiences in life that may or may not have changed since Alexander was alive since he died about three-hundred BC. In addition to the times that these histories were written, it is important to know more about the authors of these histories, Their views and approaches to writing their histories, and more about the histories in general in order to determine the accuracy and biases that …show more content…
First, let’s take a look at the historian Diodorus of Sicily. Now, Diodorus lived in the first century BC, and wrote the earliest surviving major source regarding Alexander the great’s reign. Diodorus lived near the end of the Roman Republic, and he wrote about the military campaigns of Caesar in one of his books (Bagnall et al. 2115). Now, due to the scarcity of sources on people of that time, not very much was known about this man, but it was known that he titled his history Bibliotheke or the Library as he intended to write a sort of universal history of his time. It was also known that he was from Agyrium, Sicily and he travelled all across the known world to gather the information that he needed to write his history. We also know that he wrote a great many books, but only fifteen of these books exist in full today (Sacks …show more content…
Rufus wrote the work titled Historae Alexandri Magni Macedonis or The History of Alexander the Great of Macedon. This source had 10 books, but the first two have been lost to history. Additionally, we don’t know very much about Rufus’ life or the time that he composed the book, and these things have been the topic of scholarly debate (Heckel 1). Despite this, we know that Rufus lived after the foundation of the Empire which makes him, at the earliest, a contemporary of Diodorus. Additionally, from what we know about Rufus, he had a short senatorial career the Roman province of Africa, or modern
Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.
Bury, J. B.; Russell Meiggs (2000). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great
Zonaras, Joannes, Thomas Banchich, and Eugene Lane. The History of Zonaras: from Alexander Severus to the Death of Theodosius the Great. London: Routledge, 2009. Print.
In the Lives of Noble Grecians and Romanoes, Plutarch takes the lives of several influential and prominent Greek and Roman men and describes their lives as a whole. He then compares them to each other based on “similar characteristics, situations, or periods in History.” It is believed that Alexander the Great biography was written parallel to that of Julius Caesar. Bullough described Plutrach’s Lives series as being “interested
First, Plutarch analyzed the life of Alexander the Great. Alexander was born on the 6th of Hecatombaeon from father Philip II and Olympias. Alexander’s life started off with the privilege of coming from royalty. His
Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.
There are a plethora of historical figures in history, but some of these figures are more acknowledged and discussed about than others. One of these prominent historical figures include Alexander the III, also known as Alexander the Great. There is no question that Alexander is famous for his undefeated streak during his military campaigns. However, many historians are in constant debate over whether or not Alexander was truly a military leader that deserved to be a highly prominent figure in history. They dispute over whether or not he is entitled to his nick name of Alexander the Great. Some historians argue that Alexander’s constant victories on the battle field provide more than enough reason for Alexander to be deemed great. The opposing
Diodorus and Plutarch portray Alexander with extreme amounts of arrogance because of his extravagant ideas and goals, but in Arrian’s pieces, Alexander is shown as a barbarian because of his inheritance of Persian culture.
In the countries who believed Alexander was the son of the devil or the devil himself, will say he is not ‘great’ but a demon who did evil. The countries who were on his side would say he was the greatest conqueror to live. He began as a Macedonian cavalry commander at eighteen, king of Macedonia at twenty, conqueror of Persia at twenty-six and explorer of India at thirty [Foner and Garraty]. The amount of large scale accomplishments he managed to finish in a span of six years is astonishing. Alexander’s tomb was the largest tourist attraction in the ancient world. The tomb was even visited by Julius Caesar, Pompey, Caligula, and Augustus. Alexander the Great’s accomplishments set a bar in which provided a standard that all other leaders would match their careers too. Many leaders after Alexander could not reach the standard left by him [Foner and
Alexander the Not so Great:history through Persian eyes by Prof Ali Ansari Paragraph 1 Page
Jarus, Owen. "Alexander the Great: Facts, Biography, and Accomplishments." 27 September 2013. livescience. Document. 27 October 2013.
Few historical figures stand out in the same degree as that of Alexander the Great. He was a warrior by 16, a commander at age 18, and was crowned King of Macedon by the time he was 20 years old. He did things in his lifetime that others could only dream about. Alexander single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in just over a decade. There were many attributes that made Alexander “Great.” He was a brilliant strategist and an inspired leader; he led by example and was a conqueror at heart. In looking at his early childhood, accession to the throne, conquests, marriage, and death one can see why Alexander the Great is revered in historical contexts as one of the greatest figures of all time.
In the article “A Philosopher between East and West: Aristotle and the Secret of Secrets” by Michele Campopiano, the main contribution to understanding the Alexander tradition is how it describes the impact that the philosopher Aristotle had on both the Latin west and the Arabic East. The article explains how the Secret of Secrets was translated by different people into different languages which allowed for ideas to be spread between the East and the West. This reflects in the Alexander tradition due to the reason that those texts come from different places, time periods and were translated from a variety of languages. It has not completely changed how I view texts or topics, but it has given me a deeper understanding how texts have evolved
The two Greeks Herodotus and Thucydides started the practice of reporting truth and personal knowledge of historical events above prose and poetry (vis-à-vis Homer), as well as removing much of the theological-centric content. The Roman historians that came after improved on this practice, particularly Tacitus, who used the better developed record-keeping of the times to write more concise, accurate histories with personal knowledge of the movers and shakers of the realm, both the senate and of the emperors. Tacitus’ style of history writing more closely resembles the ideal of what a historian should be, in quality, accuracy and freedom of personal idealism or slant.
The Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius was born Marcus Annius Verus on April 26, 121 A.D.. He was of a noble family originally Spanish, Aurelius grew up close to the center of power. His father was Annius Verus, his mother Domitia Lucilla. When he was a child the emperor Hadrian took interest in him because he embraced both rhetoric and philosophy; his manner was serious, his intellectual pursuits deep and devoted, so that the emperor punned on his name and called him “Verissimus”, ‘Most Truthful”. It is this quality of Aurelius character which made him a unique figure in Roman history, since he was the first emperor whose life was molded by devotion to philosophy. He received public honors from an early age and seemed to be Hadrian potential successo...