Aileen Wuornos Case Study

1254 Words3 Pages

A serial killer is a person who commits multiple murders without any type of motive and develops predictable behavior patterns. When you Google “serial killers,” the names that pop are “Luis Garavito, Javed Iqbal, Anatoly Onopriyenko, Dean Corll, Carl Panzram, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey Dahmer, Ted Bundy…” What do all of these serial killers have in common? They are all men. So, if Aileen Wuornos is categorized as a serial killer, why is her name irrelevant to this list of names? Based on the evidence that has been presented this semester, I do not think that justice was served in the Aileen Wuornos case. I believe that she had acted with self-defense, she was executed because she had bad representation and she is categorized as a serial killer …show more content…

She was raised by her grandparents but her grandmother was an alleged alcoholic and her grandfather was said to be abusive and had been molesting her. She was forced out of her home at a young age and became a sex worker. “Aileen reported that she would fight with her victims about sex and that when they became abusive, demanding that she have intercourse with them, she endeavored to protect herself from being raped” (Arrigo, 2004, p. 386). Living a dangerous life in order to survive, Wuornos had said that she murdered seven men because they had raped her. In the film, “The Selling of a Serial Killer,” it shows Aileen Wuornos testifying on her behalf. In the particular scene she describes on of the times where she felt forced to kill a man in fear that he would kill her if she did not defend herself. She had said he had been raped, choked and then he had threatened to hill her. So, in order to protect herself she felt the need to kill a man before he ended her life (Broomfield, …show more content…

The media had described Wuornos as a monster and portrayed extremely aggressive. I think that Wuornos’ case shocked society so much because she was a women killing men. But since she was seen as such an aggressive and monster-like individual, it was not believed that she acted on self-defense. If this same case happened in today’s time, I think the outcome of the trial would be extremely different. Most recently in the media, sexual assault is been taken extremely seriously and not brushed off or covered-up. If Wuornos committed these crimes in 2017 and then stated that she was in fear of her life and acted on self-defense, I think that society would view her as a woman in fear of her life, rather than a murderous animal. If Wuornos really kill men because she was afraid they would kill her, this case would have been taken way more seriously. In my opinion, the #metoo movement would applaud her, not for killing men or the murderous aspects of her crimes, but for taking a stand and for fighting

Open Document