Advantages Of Using Mixed Methods

1295 Words3 Pages

Rationale for Using Mixed Methods Language learning is a complex process. Thus, this study seeks to incorporate an interdisciplinary framework for data collection, analysis and interpretation (Smith, 1997). It is hoped that this methodology would create “dialogic opportunities to generate better understandings of important phenomena” (Greene, 2012, p. 755). I am particularly interested in aspects of complementarity (Greene, 2007), where one phenomena (English Language Learning) is studied using a primary mode (Qualitative in this project), while jointly analyzing the larger context based on a quantitative study. I will investigate both the lived experiences of individual’s students and the larger structures of language learning such as the …show more content…

This study requires a zoom in zoom out function, which helps recognize and make connections between individual lived experiences and the larger organizational, social structures that mediate these experiences. Furthermore, mixed methods are based on the premise that in using different methods for inquiry allows for dialogic inquiry that aids in better understanding (Greene, 2012).As such, would allow me to provide a thick description (Geertz, 1973) of the multiple forms of evidence I provide for my arguments (Smith, 1997). Thus, this study is interested in triangulation, which seeks convergence, to increase the validity of the construct by measuring the same phenomenon using multiple methods (Greene, 2007). Mixed methods, as conceptualized in this study, allows for “mixed method lite”, where the mixing is done only at the methodological level with one dominant (in this study the qualitative analysis) and one secondary methodology (Greene, 2012 p.758). Since the purpose of using mixed methods in this particular study is based on improving understanding, this level of mixing is deemed appropriate. For instance, one part of first research question is concerned with identifying language learning experiences of students in the various tracks. While, the qualitative methodology will be able to provide information based on a detailed description of these experiences and how they are perceived by the students, the …show more content…

Overall, the methodology in collecting and analyzing will be based on Critical Discourse analysis (CDA), as described by Gee (2014). CDA is a methodology based on a theory of language which seeks to tie individual communication structures to larger contextual and social issues. The theorizing of this method is based on the assumption that speakers use language to co-construct relationships, roles and identities, particularly in terms of privilege and marginalization. More importantly, this methodology helps examine what the data gathered from the interviews and other sources such as observations and documents really mean. As such, the interpretation of the data based on the student’s narratives could be warranted

Open Document