Adnan Syed Case

1306 Words3 Pages

On January 13th, 1999, a high school girl from Baltimore, Maryland, Hae Min Lee disappeared after school. Hae was found just a few miles away in Leakin Park, a few weeks later, where it was determined that the cause of death was manual strangulation. Not long after, Hae’s ex-boyfriend, Adnan Syed was arrested and tried for her murder and is now spending life in prison. After hearing Sarah Koneig’s Podcast, Serial where she went back to re-investigate the trial it became clear that the jury does not have enough evidence to convict Adnan Syed for the murder of Hae Min Lee for many reasons including, the lack of evidence, lack of motive, and the reliance of memory is not enough to convict Adnan Syed.
Evidence is key to solving a murder and in the case of Hae Min Lee’s murder there was not enough evidence to prove that Adnan Syed killed her. There was several pieces of evidence that helped build the case, but none was enough to actually convict Adnan of murder. For instance, there was no DNA evidence that proved Adnan killed Hae. DNA evidence was found in Hae’s car that belonged to Adnan, but then again
Sarah even asked her own nephew, Sam to recall what he did on a specific night six weeks ago and he seemed very torn about his answer. Sam says, “Not a clue. In school, probably. Umm… actually I think I worked that day. Actually I don’t think I went to school that day.” Then Sam’s friend Elliot says, “I may have gone to the movies that night. I think I saw “22 Jump Street.” I went with Sam, Sean, Carter, a bunch of people.” By conducting this experiment Sarah was trying to show how it is very hard to remember events from days or even weeks before, especially if it is an ordinary day and there is nothing significant to remember like a big test, or a

More about Adnan Syed Case

Open Document