Absolutism Vs Relativism

576 Words2 Pages

In a world that gradually wants impartial evidence for all statements that are made, be they methodical or spiritual, it would appear that as civilization advances, we are not really in hunting for absolute certainty. We are eager to give and take, oversee and in some cases disregard the obvious fact. In a multicultural society, it is essential to debate absolutism and relativism, irrespective of the effects of spiritual arguments have supported with them to the present day. Absolutism and relativism can eventually be the directing factor as to how individuals, groups and countries act and reply to incentives. It is the variance in the midst of achievement and expiration. The Christian views will certainly strength some to be opposed ethical totalitarianism, but the fact residues that only one single fact can be true. The philosophy of non-contradiction cannot agree for several facts or truths, so only one can rule as undeniably true. …show more content…

It retains that some things are just always right and some things are just always wrong. They are permanent for all period, places and individuals. A well-known example of Absolutism is Kantian Ethics. Some benefits of Absolutism is that it permits moral rules to be assessed unfavorably, It is reasonable as individuals are treated the same because the rules are the same for everyone. And if a moral rule is true, then there would be no need to altered rules for diverse society since the absolute rules are worldwide. On the other hand, sometimes it is not appropriate to treat people the same due to circumstances that arise due to situations. Everyone’s life is not black and white. It is basically not correct to make everyone live by the same

Open Document