Abortion Case Analysis

774 Words2 Pages

Abortion is a practice that many find immoral. This medical procedure allows a woman to terminate a pregnancy within the first few weeks. This issue has caused an uproar from both sides, to consider the question of the morality of the issue. While watching John Oliver, I have found some statements, made by him, explaining why abortion is important and why he is pro-choice. He claims that abortion is ok in certain circumstance, especially rape, the possibility of death, and or defects to the mother or baby. But ultimately, he thinks whatever the reason, the woman can choose to terminate. He also claims that it is within her rights to make such a decision.
He begins his argument by reviewing the law. He explains that abortion laws can no longer be understood by the Roe v. Wade case. Roe v. Wade protected women and allow them to get an abortion during the first trimester. Oliver pointed out that Planned Parenthood v. Casey is the major case we should discuss, when, it comes to placing laws on the issue. He wanted to point out that in the final conclusion of the case, which stated "An undue burden… [Places] a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion. He then begins to explain how states have started to place "undue burdens" in front of women to reduce the amount of abortion given. …show more content…

Oliver is examining more of the legal side of the argument, but as the episode continues he starts to discuss how some local the governments should not use this issue for "protecting the woman 's body". He begins to question, why can 't women pick their own laws for their own bodies? This question is where I began to ask more question on the morality of that statement alone. But besides that point, he makes it clear that abortion laws do not fall under trying to help women, they fall under the thought process of lawmakers and anti-abortion members. Some anti-abortion members would rather see a woman lose their life rather than the

Open Document