Abortion Case Summary

1539 Words4 Pages

In 1973, Texas pregnant resident by the name “Jane Roe” to protect her identity wanted to get an abortion. Texas had a law that stated women couldn’t get an abortion unless it was to save a pregnant woman's life otherwise it was criminalized. Roe challenged Texas law and brought it to the District Court. A licensed physician by the name of Hallford who had two abortion prosecutions pending intervened helping Roe standing to sue. Another childless married couple ‘the Does’ also helped Roe attacking the law at the District courts. Roe, Hallford, and ‘the Does’ appealed the injunctive relief to states supreme court. The district court dismissed ‘the Does’ complaints by declaring the abortion status void by affirming ninth amendment and dismissed the application for injunctive relief. The court of appeals said the supreme court would not hear a case if it's not ready yet. Roe claim was moot because she had the baby already, but the supreme court still took the case because pregnancy is capable of happening again. …show more content…

Texas argument is that a fetus is a person and they have rights as a person. The supreme court ruled that that a fetus is not a person consider under law. Also the court ruled that Texas cannot override the rights of a women for the rights of a fetus based on a theory. The court found a balance and ruled that in the first trimester you can get an abortion but after your first trimester the states has to declare whether or not you can get an abortion in the second and third trimester. The court also establish that it was a woman's right to an abortion under the right of privacy protected by the fourteenth

Open Document