A critical review of the portrayal of disability in the Kings Speech

817 Words2 Pages

The King’s Speech is loosely based upon Prince Albert’s speech impediment and the anxious speech he has to deliver as the future King of England, George the VI. Central to the movie is the relationship between Prince Albert and the unconventional Australian speech therapist, Lionel Logue. The premise of the film is the improvement of Prince Alberts’ stutter under the guidance of Logue and the desperate need to inspire and reassure a nation during the wake of World War 2 (WW2).

According to Kraaimaat, Vanryckeghem and Dam-Baggen (2002), stuttering was commonly viewed as an intellectual disability or as being psychologically deficient (p. 319). However, the portrayal of stuttering in the film shows King George as more than capable to carry out his royal duties with ease and that it was not his lack of intelligence that hindered his work. He was able to read to his young children, communicate efficiently with his wife, and talk politics with his father, expressing varying degrees of ease with which he communicated. However, his speech impediment propagated under duress, namely speaking with his demanding father and distant older brother. Therefore, this movie challenges the perceptions of pre-conceived notions of stuttering as a disability.

The disability in the film was portrayed as being associated with anxiety, shame, embarrassment and a sense of failure. This is evident in the opening scene of the film when Prince Albert failed to give an articulate speech to the discomfort of the crowd and distress of his wife. Also, the study conducted by Miller and Watson (1992) suggests that people who stutter do not have increased general anxiety unless they are faced with a situation where they have to speak publicly. This increase i...

... middle of paper ...

...rince what name he will choose as king. Churchill also stuttered and went on to become a powerful orator. This educates and raises awareness to students that though one has a disability it should not hinder them from achieving their goals. It also conveys to non-stutterers that people with a speech disability are not regarded as unintelligent.
The movie accurately depicted stuttering given that the story is written by David Seidler, himself a person who stutters, and directed by Tom Hooper. Perhaps the director puts his own perspectives in the film. However it ties in well with the literature.
In conclusion, the Kings speech portrayed stuttering in a sympathetic manner. there is no cure for stuttering but with the help of speech therapy, meditation and pharmaceuticals as part of modern therapeutic practice, individuals can overcome their fear of public speaking.

Open Document