A Rhetorical Analysis Essay On Thomas Paine

627 Words2 Pages

In an excerpt from Thomas Paine's work Common Sense, Mr. Paine writes to the colonists of pre-revolutionary America, attempting to convince them of the necessity of a democratic form of government, and separation from the Crown of England. He does this by effectively explaining the fundamental reasoning behind humans utilizing governing groups in society, and supporting his arguments with a plethora of rhetorical devices and appeals.
Throughout Paine's writing, he contrasts two concepts usually considered similar and invariably connected, society and government. He uses antithesis to emphatically claim that society is the better of the two, and they are more opposites in effect than they are akin to one another. This is found where he asserts, …show more content…

2). This substantiates his moving personification found later in the text profusely because, if he views such organizations as inherently negative, then he does not take lightly any endorsement of those institutions. As he elaborates upon the idea of democratic governance, he declares, “the simple voice of nature and of reason will say, it is right” (Paine, par. 7). The implications of the personifying of nature and reason in this statement are as follows: they speak the same thoughts of pro-democracy and political representation to all sane men, and so carry the sense that the colonial audience of the manuscript should think similarly. This augments Paine’s argument, challenging the people of the thirteen colonies to become themselves voices of reason by admitting to their societies and governments their own thoughts and desires, or, in doing otherwise, ignore the very bridle of the civilized man, logic and reason. Thomas Paine expands upon his antipathy towards being governed with the informative logos of the following excerpt: “government… in its worst state [is] an intolerable one; for when we suffer… our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer” (Paine, par. 2). This explains Paine’s idea so that the audience agrees; reason does point towards added aggravation if one furthers their own agony. This in turn causes a greater

Open Document