A Modest Proposal Rhetorical Analysis

795 Words2 Pages

In “A Modest Proposal”, the “author” in the essay is an Irish Protestant who is in the wealthy class. He comes across as being sympathetic for the Catholics in this situation, but at the same time, he dislikes them. He goes to great lengths to detail the advantages he proposes for the wealthy who would be the ones to implement it, and then he ironically implicates the wealthy class for being greedy. He sees them as selfishly taking care of their own needs and interests and ignoring the needs of their impoverished nation. Swift comments that more Catholic babies are born nine months after Lent and will flood the market with infants. Later on, he says his proposal “will have one other collateral advantage, by lessening the number of papists among us” (317). Swift reveals the “author’s” animosity towards papists by wanting to reduce the number of their children and therefore reducing the amount of Catholics. Since a continuing conflict existed between the …show more content…

He accomplishes this by making his proposal absurd through the use of satire. The reader finally realizes the absurdity of the “proposal”. For example, Swift recommends that people should eat children, who are helpless and innocent. Because Swift talks about killing and eating the children so flippantly and without guilt, the audience is able to see his insincerity and untrustworthiness. He states that he has “the least personal interest” in killing many of Ireland’s children for food. Swift does not believe that “endeavoring [them] to promote this necessary work” of “the public good of” Ireland by the advancement of their “trade, providing for infants, [and] relieving the poor” (320). Swift also displays a sense of insincerity is when he states that he does not have any personal attachment to his proposal because he does not have a suitable child and that his wife is no longer able to bear

Open Document