A Good Man Is Hard To Find Character Analysis

848 Words2 Pages

To what extent is it worth to manipulate someone in order to satisfy one’s own desire? This is what we find out through the characters in Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace” which shows us the main character’s unhappiness to be born in a family of clerks and who feels she is entitled to be wealthy, and “A Good Man is Hard to Find” by Flannery O'Connor where the main character, just described as “the grandmother”, tries to persuade her son not to go on a family trip to Florida so that she can visit some acquaintances she has in Tennessee. The characters reasons for being so manipulative are clearly very different in both stories, but they both show us what one is capable of to fulfill his or her wishes. Through a comparison of Mathilde …show more content…

In order to convince her son, she tells him about a criminal, The Mistif, who is very dangerous, gets loose, and heads toward Florida (O’Connor 1). The family ends up heading to Florida, and during the trip the grandmother remembers about a plantation nearby. She manipulates the kids in order for them to convince their father to deviate and stop by that plantation because “she knew that Bailey would not be willing to lose any time looking at an old house” (O’Connor 45). To make the kids want to see that house by the plantation she tells them “there was a secret panel in [that] house” but she “[was] not telling the truth but wishing that she were” (O’Connor 45). Beiley ends up being convinced by the kids. On their way to the plantation they suffer a car accident and are helped by “The Mistif” himself. Afraid, the grandmother again tries to use her manipulative “power” by trying to convince the criminal that he is “"a good man” (O’Connor 98) and that If he “would pray, Jesus would help [him]."(O’Connor 118). The grandmother nowhere in the story seemed to be religious and she only used “Jesus” as a way to get away from that tense situation and make the criminal not want to kill her family. In the end, all her manipulation is of no use because The Mistif not only kills her entire family but also shoots her three …show more content…

She is described as a girl that belongs to the middle-class and really wants to be rich and dreams about “Oriental carpets”, “candlesticks of bronze”,“great arm-chairs”, a “beautiful cabinet holding priceless curios” (Maupassant 2). When she finally has a chance to be among those riches after being invited to a beautiful ball thrown by her husband’s boss, the minister of public instruction, she throws a fit so that she can convince her husband that she has nothing to wear (Maupassant 10). To accomplish what she wants she cries and has “Two big tears [rolling] down from the corners of her eyes to the corners of her mouth” (Maupassant 11). Her husband is finally touched and convinced and sets four hundred francs aside to buy her a dress. When the day of the ball comes close and Mathilde realizes that she does not have “ a single ornament of any kind to put on” (Maupassant 20), she borrows a diamond necklace from a friend of hers after she “poured out her woes” (Maupassant 24), certainly touching her friend’s heart so that she would not refuse to lend her the jewel. It ends up that Mathilde loses the necklace at the end of the ball, works all her life to pay for a replacement, not realizing that she lost all the good years of her life working to pay for a necklace that is “paste” and that “was worth only about five hundred francs!” (Maupassant

Open Document