A Comparison Of Ben Lincoln

938 Words2 Pages

One of the many brilliant things Ben Franklin once said was, “Well done is better than well said.” Being a pioneer of electricity, the inventor of bifocals, and one of the founding fathers of the United State’s constitution, Franklin knew more than a little about changing society and history for the better. The ideals of this successful man are parallel to the ideas of John Ruskin, who describes that as a society, “What we think, or what we know, or what we believe is, in the end, of little consequence. The only consequence is what we do.” This is outlook is accurate because, quite simply, there is a higher impact when something is done compared to when something is simply just thought.

To initiate, taking action is more difficult than …show more content…

While the author does include that Lincoln’s beliefs partly warrant her respect for the man, it should be taken into consideration that there were many other people during this time that had similar values as the president. The reason these men and women who may have thought the same as Lincoln are not celebrated goes back to the gap between average Joes and outliers. This is the importance of Vowell’s last clause in her statement about Lincoln. She declares that not only was he passionate for a cause, but he stood for it too. Abraham Lincoln took his beliefs, and regardless of how risky and difficult it was, he pushed, fought, and “never stopped trying to make them come true.” …show more content…

At the very least I should have testified as to the kid’s honesty.” This situation proves consequential insignificance as nothing changes because she knew it was the right thing to stick up for him. Ehrenreich feels she would have been right to defend George but, what she actually did not effect the negative situation, as she did not do anything. This occurs very similarly in George Orwell’s piece, Shooting an Elephant. The story consists of a see-saw, back and forth mental conflict for Orwell. A elephant has escaped loose, while the whole crowd that gathers around him believing it was his duty as an officer to kill it, and Orwell does not believe it to be right, fair, or logical to kill the elephant. Orwell decides to shoot it, and he then writes, “I often wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid looking a fool.” (Orwell). Here, Orwell is telling the reader that it does not matter. After killing the elephant, nobody questioned what he was really thinking. All everybody knew or cared about was that he rid of the colossus beast, and that was that. Likewise to all situations of beliefs, Orwell only would have found out the result of keeping the elephant alive if he had done so. An idea is modestly just that, and until it is brought up and out of a person’s brain to the real word, that is all it will ever

Open Document