A Change Of Heart About Animals Summary

421 Words1 Page

After reading the articles,”A Change of Heart about Animals”, by author Jeremy Rifkin, “Hooked on a Myth”, by author Victoria Braithwaite, and “Of Primates and Personhood: Will According Rights and “dignity” to NonHuman Organisms Halt research?”,by author Ed Yong, I both agree and refute some things that are represented in all three articles. In the articles by Rifkin and Yong, I believe that there should be more examples present. In my opinion they were just making assumptions rather than stating facts in order to backup their claims. For example in the article by Rifkin he states” They feel pain,suffer and experience stress, affection,excitement and even love--and these findings are changing how we view animals” (Rifkin 2). By him saying this statement shows that he only states this statement off of what he thinks rather than off of logic and research. On the other hand in the article by Braithwaite’s article, her use of scientific words,and logic, showed me that she knows a lot on that subject. For example she uses words such as,”If you look at thin sections of the trigeminal nerve, the main nerve for the face for all vertebrates, fish have …show more content…

In the article “ A Change of Heart about Animals”, author Jeremy Rifkin uses pathos by explaining the different things that animals go through on a daily basis. For example in the text he states that,”Elephants will often stand next to their dead kin for days, occasionally touching their bodies with their trunks.”(Rifkin 11). This statement shows that he is trying to appeal to the emotions of the readers by explaining the different actions that animals encounter. Also in the article by Ed Yong he states that “Not everyone is comfortable with GAP’s rights-based approach”(Yong 4) This statement is basically appealing to the readers emotions by saying that all people do not totally agree with the actions of the

Open Document