What he means is that animals are conscious creatures that are aware of their environment and have goals , desires, and emotions. They should not be forced to suffer through things that they cannot prevent. It is our job as humans to speak up against the dreadful things that animals are forced to go through. Many people that are in favor of animal testing say simply that the lives of people are more important than the lives of animals, and while it is unfortunate that sometimes animals must suffer and die, it is worth it if human lives are saved by this research. Thousands of years ago, humans began to use animals for the purpos... ... middle of paper ... ... say that they are against animal cruelty but won’t stand up for it.
Animals Rights Is it fair that animals have to go through abuse neglect and torture every day over a simple fact that humans do not believe animals do not have rights? Humans use and kill animals for food or clothing. Because people or humans think of animals as property so they do as they please with animals Some people believe that animals should be treated in the same way humans are and have familiar rights, where others think that it is more important to use them as they desire for food and medical research. This Paper will discuss both points of view. With and explanation of animals, people believe it is acceptable for several reasons.
A number of people feel that animals have emotions like humans and have a secret way of life in which humans do not understand. Animal rights advocates believe that animals deserve rights because they are unable to communicate as humans do, possess emotions and play an important part in the environment. Others would strongly object to this belief. Killing animals for food has been practiced for many of years and is a part of our survival. There are regions with a lack of natural predators to control the animal population.
We have since seen many animals including whales and birds who communicate using language and movement. What about when it comes to feelings? Although animals do not have the ability to talk or make decisions, sentience, which is described as the ability to suffer, plays a big role in the animal rights movement. Activists strongly believe that because an animal has the ability to suffer, it is worthy of moral consideration. “the question is not, Can they reason?
Many people share a strong bond with non-human animals, such as dogs and cats. So why is there still disavowal on animal testing being unsuitable? As you have most likely heard, several, of people try to explain how without testing on animals we could be putting ourselves at risk. Since we have the power to try the product on an animal who is unable to say no at first, why not, right ?However, animals are living creatures and deserve the same treatment as humans do, just because animals are unable to speak and tell us what is hurting them, should we take advantage of them? Provided that the three most important rights a human has is when; a person’s life, health or freedom is at risk.
I agree with Gandhi statement, many animals are tested on, have been in cruel situation and so on, but testing on animals is wrong choice. Our moral value does not revolved around these animals, no, they revolved on the new drug or new treatment that come out every year. However, there are many pros and cons about animal testing for example, some of the pros would be, that animal testing gives us the most accurate effect on substance on a livin... ... middle of paper ... ...e predicted outcomes of the human body system. I believe animal research is cruel and unnecessary to use as an advantage to understand the possibilities of the outcomes of what could happen to the human body system. Works Cited "Animal Research FAQs."
We as humans can do a little at a time until we helped both fellow humans and our fur-friends the animals. Activists lobbies get laws changed where animals are concerned. Activists in animal rights movement believe animals should have the same rights to health and happiness as humans beings since the animals have to suffer emotional as well as physical trauma like humans. People disagree about how animals should and can be used and about how much rights animals have if any. The answer truly depends on what a person thinks an animals is as we recognize more fully our own fragile existence on this planet, we begin to take the fate of other species in consideration.
Evidenced by the researchers’ compassion, humans’ feelings towards animals are very personal. In the article, “An Ethical Argument Against Vivisection”, “Animals are seen simply as resources – as little more than products to make our lives more convenient ... ... middle of paper ... ... we are morally obligated to protect infants, the developmentally disabled, and the mentally ill” (“An Ethical Argument Against Vivisection”). Humans have to realize that the choice is in their hands. Animal testing is wrong and people must stand up for animals because no one else can. Works Cited "ANIMALS IN SCIENCE."
Some scientist feel that they could find healthy alternatives, while others feel that they have the right to use animals in their experiments, and that the animals are inferior to humans; therefore, have no rights ("Controversy of Animal Testing - About Animal Testing (UK)"). Scientist preform a lot of experiments on animals, but more than ninety percent of them are for human benefit (“Adams, Stephen”). Things like cosmetics, vaccinations, and solution to diseases. A major flaw within doing these things is that animals and humans have different genetic structures. By them having different genetic structures it makes it difficult because they could find something that works for an animal but could harm a human and the other way around.
When it comes to animals and their rights, there is a definite line between our needs and our taking advantage of those species that we consider inferior. As long as man has existed he has been carnivorous, and the same holds true for many other species of animals. Animals are a necessity to humans for survival, whether it be for food, clothing, etc. However, the unnecessary torture of animals through testing is not a necessity for human survival. When it comes to the needless torture of animals that we claim to benefit, the animals lives need to be taken into consideration.